Do political theorists have friends?: Towards a redefinition of political friendship

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article suggests a sensitising definition of political friendship with the view of using the concept in empirical research. I begin by identifying three tendencies in the recent literature on political friendship: (1) the tendency to ignore historical developments that rendered modern friendship an intimate relationship; (2) the construction of modern friendship as hermetically sealed in the private sphere; and (3) the conceptual conflation of relationship types. Consequently, friendship is emptied of substantive relational content, while political ‘friendship’ is promoted from metaphor to denotative concept. I critique that approach by drawing on Maria Márkus’s account of friendship, which emphasises its historically contingent, ambiguous position between the private and the public spheres whence friendship offers vital utopian potentials in respect of public life: friendship instantiates mutual self-determination and gives experiential substance to ‘decency’. Combining Márkus’s with a differentiating approach to friendship that takes its lead from Siegfried Kracauer, I go on to propose a preliminary redefinition of political friendship as a personal relationship, as well as the substitution of political friendship by democratic solidarity with ‘decency’ its guiding orientation.

LanguageEnglish
Pages50-68
Number of pages19
JournalThesis Eleven
Volume151
Issue number1
Early online date22 Mar 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

friendship
Redefinition
Friendship
Theorists
historical development
self-determination
substitution
solidarity
empirical research
metaphor

Keywords

  • decency
  • intimacy
  • Maria Márkus
  • political friendship
  • solidarity

Cite this

@article{1bef281f74c54d1b8024e654572aafa1,
title = "Do political theorists have friends?: Towards a redefinition of political friendship",
abstract = "This article suggests a sensitising definition of political friendship with the view of using the concept in empirical research. I begin by identifying three tendencies in the recent literature on political friendship: (1) the tendency to ignore historical developments that rendered modern friendship an intimate relationship; (2) the construction of modern friendship as hermetically sealed in the private sphere; and (3) the conceptual conflation of relationship types. Consequently, friendship is emptied of substantive relational content, while political ‘friendship’ is promoted from metaphor to denotative concept. I critique that approach by drawing on Maria M{\'a}rkus’s account of friendship, which emphasises its historically contingent, ambiguous position between the private and the public spheres whence friendship offers vital utopian potentials in respect of public life: friendship instantiates mutual self-determination and gives experiential substance to ‘decency’. Combining M{\'a}rkus’s with a differentiating approach to friendship that takes its lead from Siegfried Kracauer, I go on to propose a preliminary redefinition of political friendship as a personal relationship, as well as the substitution of political friendship by democratic solidarity with ‘decency’ its guiding orientation.",
keywords = "decency, intimacy, Maria M{\'a}rkus, political friendship, solidarity",
author = "Harry Blatterer",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0725513619838664",
language = "English",
volume = "151",
pages = "50--68",
journal = "Thesis Eleven",
issn = "0725-5136",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

Do political theorists have friends? Towards a redefinition of political friendship. / Blatterer, Harry.

In: Thesis Eleven, Vol. 151, No. 1, 01.04.2019, p. 50-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do political theorists have friends?

T2 - Thesis Eleven

AU - Blatterer,Harry

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - This article suggests a sensitising definition of political friendship with the view of using the concept in empirical research. I begin by identifying three tendencies in the recent literature on political friendship: (1) the tendency to ignore historical developments that rendered modern friendship an intimate relationship; (2) the construction of modern friendship as hermetically sealed in the private sphere; and (3) the conceptual conflation of relationship types. Consequently, friendship is emptied of substantive relational content, while political ‘friendship’ is promoted from metaphor to denotative concept. I critique that approach by drawing on Maria Márkus’s account of friendship, which emphasises its historically contingent, ambiguous position between the private and the public spheres whence friendship offers vital utopian potentials in respect of public life: friendship instantiates mutual self-determination and gives experiential substance to ‘decency’. Combining Márkus’s with a differentiating approach to friendship that takes its lead from Siegfried Kracauer, I go on to propose a preliminary redefinition of political friendship as a personal relationship, as well as the substitution of political friendship by democratic solidarity with ‘decency’ its guiding orientation.

AB - This article suggests a sensitising definition of political friendship with the view of using the concept in empirical research. I begin by identifying three tendencies in the recent literature on political friendship: (1) the tendency to ignore historical developments that rendered modern friendship an intimate relationship; (2) the construction of modern friendship as hermetically sealed in the private sphere; and (3) the conceptual conflation of relationship types. Consequently, friendship is emptied of substantive relational content, while political ‘friendship’ is promoted from metaphor to denotative concept. I critique that approach by drawing on Maria Márkus’s account of friendship, which emphasises its historically contingent, ambiguous position between the private and the public spheres whence friendship offers vital utopian potentials in respect of public life: friendship instantiates mutual self-determination and gives experiential substance to ‘decency’. Combining Márkus’s with a differentiating approach to friendship that takes its lead from Siegfried Kracauer, I go on to propose a preliminary redefinition of political friendship as a personal relationship, as well as the substitution of political friendship by democratic solidarity with ‘decency’ its guiding orientation.

KW - decency

KW - intimacy

KW - Maria Márkus

KW - political friendship

KW - solidarity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063331174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0725513619838664

DO - 10.1177/0725513619838664

M3 - Article

VL - 151

SP - 50

EP - 68

JO - Thesis Eleven

JF - Thesis Eleven

SN - 0725-5136

IS - 1

ER -