Projects per year
Abstract
Philosophical tradition and conspiracy theorists converge in suggesting that ordinary people ought to do their own research, rather than accept the word of others. In this paper, I argue that it’s no accident that conspiracy theorists value lay research on expert topics: such research is likely to undermine knowledge, via its effects on truth and justification. Accepting expert testimony is a far more reliable route to truth. Nevertheless, lay research has a range of benefits; in particular, it is likely to lead to greater understanding, even when it does not lead to knowledge. I argue that we can reap most of the genuine benefits of lay research while minimizing the risks by engaging in exploratory, rather than truth-directed, inquiry. To engage in exploratory inquiry is to engage dogmatically, expecting to be unable to confirm the expert view or to disconfirm rivals.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 356 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-19 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Synthese |
| Volume | 200 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Early online date | 20 Aug 2022 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright the Author(s) 2022. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.Keywords
- knowledge
- understanding
- conspiracy theories
- intellectual autonomy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Do your own research!'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
-
Changing philosophical perceptions of belief in a post-truth world
Levy, N. (Primary Chief Investigator) & MQRES, M. (Student)
1/01/18 → 31/12/20
Project: Research
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver