Does a learning style preference for processing information through reflection impact on the academic performance of a cohort of undergraduate pharmacy students?

Cherie Tsingos, Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich, Lorraine Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Reflective processes have shown to improve clinical decision making skills. Furthermore, students tend to develop certain learning styles, some utilising reflective processes while others do not.

Aims: To investigate the relationships between reflective and non-reflective learning styles, and academic performance of pharmacy students.

Methods: Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory (Kolb, 2007) and a demographic questionnaire were administered to first year undergraduates. Analysis was conducted using the statistical procedure, ANCOVA.

Results: 209 completed questionnaires (response rate 91%) indicated pharmacy students have a stronger preference for the assimilator (44%) learning style. Students who preferred to process information through reflection achieved greater academic success compared to those students who did not (p< 0.05). Gender was also a significant factor (p< 0.05).

Conclusion: This study presents evidence that suggests aspects of effective learning may involve reflection. Further research into the methods by which pharmacy students prefer to learn and their relationship with academic outcomes are recommended.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)233-240
Number of pages8
JournalPharmacy Education
Volume15
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Academic Performance
  • Higher Education
  • Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory
  • Pharmacy Education
  • Reflection
  • Reflective Learning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does a learning style preference for processing information through reflection impact on the academic performance of a cohort of undergraduate pharmacy students?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this