Does evidence-based medicine training improve doctors’ knowledge, practice and patient outcomes?: A systematic review of the evidence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Courses in Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) for doctors have consistently demonstrated short-term improvements in knowledge. However, there is no strong evidence linking EBM training to changes in clinical practice or patient outcomes. This systematic review investigates whether EBM training leads to sustained improvements in doctors’ knowledge and practice behaviors that may also facilitate changes in patient outcomes and experiences. A literature search was undertaken in Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, The Cochrane Library, ERIC and Scopus. Studies published from 1997 to 2016 that assessed outcomes of EBM educational interventions amongst doctors and used measures of knowledge, skills, attitudes, practice or patient outcomes were included. Fifteen studies were included in the analysis: four randomized controlled trials (RCTs), three non-RCTs, and eight before-after (longitudinal cohort) studies. Heterogeneity among studies prevented meaningful comparisons. Varying degrees of bias due to the use of subjective measures were identified, limiting study validity. Results showed that EBM interventions can improve short-term knowledge and skills, but there is little reliable evidence of changes in long-term knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practice. No study measured improvement in patient outcomes or experiences. EBM training for medical practitioners needs to incorporate measures of behavioral changes while incorporating patient outcomes and experience measures.

LanguageEnglish
Pages532-538
Number of pages7
JournalMedical teacher
Volume41
Issue number5
Early online date17 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019

Fingerprint

medicine
evidence
experience
trend

Cite this

@article{f80a8ffada304bdb9fe985cfd6741b33,
title = "Does evidence-based medicine training improve doctors’ knowledge, practice and patient outcomes?: A systematic review of the evidence",
abstract = "Courses in Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) for doctors have consistently demonstrated short-term improvements in knowledge. However, there is no strong evidence linking EBM training to changes in clinical practice or patient outcomes. This systematic review investigates whether EBM training leads to sustained improvements in doctors’ knowledge and practice behaviors that may also facilitate changes in patient outcomes and experiences. A literature search was undertaken in Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, The Cochrane Library, ERIC and Scopus. Studies published from 1997 to 2016 that assessed outcomes of EBM educational interventions amongst doctors and used measures of knowledge, skills, attitudes, practice or patient outcomes were included. Fifteen studies were included in the analysis: four randomized controlled trials (RCTs), three non-RCTs, and eight before-after (longitudinal cohort) studies. Heterogeneity among studies prevented meaningful comparisons. Varying degrees of bias due to the use of subjective measures were identified, limiting study validity. Results showed that EBM interventions can improve short-term knowledge and skills, but there is little reliable evidence of changes in long-term knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practice. No study measured improvement in patient outcomes or experiences. EBM training for medical practitioners needs to incorporate measures of behavioral changes while incorporating patient outcomes and experience measures.",
author = "Simons, {Mary R.} and Yvonne Zurynski and Jeremy Cullis and Morgan, {Michael K.} and Davidson, {Andrew S.}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1080/0142159X.2018.1503646",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "532--538",
journal = "Medical teacher",
issn = "0142-159X",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "5",

}

Does evidence-based medicine training improve doctors’ knowledge, practice and patient outcomes? A systematic review of the evidence. / Simons, Mary R.; Zurynski, Yvonne; Cullis, Jeremy; Morgan, Michael K.; Davidson, Andrew S.

In: Medical teacher, Vol. 41, No. 5, 06.2019, p. 532-538.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does evidence-based medicine training improve doctors’ knowledge, practice and patient outcomes?

T2 - Medical teacher

AU - Simons, Mary R.

AU - Zurynski, Yvonne

AU - Cullis, Jeremy

AU - Morgan, Michael K.

AU - Davidson, Andrew S.

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - Courses in Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) for doctors have consistently demonstrated short-term improvements in knowledge. However, there is no strong evidence linking EBM training to changes in clinical practice or patient outcomes. This systematic review investigates whether EBM training leads to sustained improvements in doctors’ knowledge and practice behaviors that may also facilitate changes in patient outcomes and experiences. A literature search was undertaken in Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, The Cochrane Library, ERIC and Scopus. Studies published from 1997 to 2016 that assessed outcomes of EBM educational interventions amongst doctors and used measures of knowledge, skills, attitudes, practice or patient outcomes were included. Fifteen studies were included in the analysis: four randomized controlled trials (RCTs), three non-RCTs, and eight before-after (longitudinal cohort) studies. Heterogeneity among studies prevented meaningful comparisons. Varying degrees of bias due to the use of subjective measures were identified, limiting study validity. Results showed that EBM interventions can improve short-term knowledge and skills, but there is little reliable evidence of changes in long-term knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practice. No study measured improvement in patient outcomes or experiences. EBM training for medical practitioners needs to incorporate measures of behavioral changes while incorporating patient outcomes and experience measures.

AB - Courses in Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) for doctors have consistently demonstrated short-term improvements in knowledge. However, there is no strong evidence linking EBM training to changes in clinical practice or patient outcomes. This systematic review investigates whether EBM training leads to sustained improvements in doctors’ knowledge and practice behaviors that may also facilitate changes in patient outcomes and experiences. A literature search was undertaken in Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, The Cochrane Library, ERIC and Scopus. Studies published from 1997 to 2016 that assessed outcomes of EBM educational interventions amongst doctors and used measures of knowledge, skills, attitudes, practice or patient outcomes were included. Fifteen studies were included in the analysis: four randomized controlled trials (RCTs), three non-RCTs, and eight before-after (longitudinal cohort) studies. Heterogeneity among studies prevented meaningful comparisons. Varying degrees of bias due to the use of subjective measures were identified, limiting study validity. Results showed that EBM interventions can improve short-term knowledge and skills, but there is little reliable evidence of changes in long-term knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practice. No study measured improvement in patient outcomes or experiences. EBM training for medical practitioners needs to incorporate measures of behavioral changes while incorporating patient outcomes and experience measures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055266955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1503646

DO - 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1503646

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 532

EP - 538

JO - Medical teacher

JF - Medical teacher

SN - 0142-159X

IS - 5

ER -