Abstract
This study examines the empirical controversy over the pricing effect of the Easley, Hvidkjaer, and O[U+05F3]Hara (2002) probability of information-based trading, PIN, on a sample of 30,095 firms from 47 countries worldwide. Contrary to the empirical evidence of Easley, Hvidkjaer, and O[U+05F3]Hara, but consistent with that of Duarte and Young (2009), we do not find that PIN exhibits a positive effect on a cross section of expected stock returns in international markets. Alternative information-based trading measures also display no effect on expected stock returns, corroborating our finding that information risk proxied by PIN, in general, has no pricing effect in world markets.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 178-195 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Journal of Financial Economics |
Volume | 114 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2014 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Asset pricing
- Information risk
- International markets
- PIN