Abstract
This study examines the empirical controversy over the pricing effect of the Easley, Hvidkjaer, and O[U+05F3]Hara (2002) probability of information-based trading, PIN, on a sample of 30,095 firms from 47 countries worldwide. Contrary to the empirical evidence of Easley, Hvidkjaer, and O[U+05F3]Hara, but consistent with that of Duarte and Young (2009), we do not find that PIN exhibits a positive effect on a cross section of expected stock returns in international markets. Alternative information-based trading measures also display no effect on expected stock returns, corroborating our finding that information risk proxied by PIN, in general, has no pricing effect in world markets.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 178-195 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Journal of Financial Economics |
| Volume | 114 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Asset pricing
- Information risk
- International markets
- PIN
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Does PIN affect equity prices around the world?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver