Does the method of “securing the catheter” make any difference?

James W. H. Macneil, Rachel G. Wilkins, Russell P. Taylor, Howard M. Lau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine whether commonly used methods of securing an indwelling catheter decrease the force transmission along the indwelling catheter to the bladder neck in response to an externally applied force. Materials and methods: A test apparatus was constructed to simulate key features of a catheter drainage system. A “bladder neck” was suspended from a force gauge, with an indwelling catheter inserted through it, tensioned with a urine drainage bag. The system was calibrated, and various methods of securement were tested, with the level of force transmitted to the bladder neck recorded. The methods of securement tested included: adhesive tape taped used a number of ways (including direct taping and a taped mesentery), and three commercially available devices. Results: Some securement devices were able to completely eliminate force transmission to the bladder neck (the Flexi-Trak and Grip-Lok devices). A taped mesentery performed well reducing the transmitted force by up to 85% compared with an unsecured control. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study we were able to demonstrate that some of the commonly used methods of securing indwelling catheters do work. We were also able to show that adhesive tape was still effective, although not as effective as commercially available devices.

LanguageEnglish
Pages21-26
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Urology
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Indwelling Catheters
Catheters
Urinary Bladder
Equipment and Supplies
Mesentery
Adhesives
Drainage
Hand Strength
Urine

Keywords

  • catheter securement
  • movement induced trauma
  • patient safety
  • Urethral trauma
  • urinary catheter

Cite this

Macneil, James W. H. ; Wilkins, Rachel G. ; Taylor, Russell P. ; Lau, Howard M. / Does the method of “securing the catheter” make any difference?. In: Journal of Clinical Urology. 2018 ; Vol. 11, No. 1. pp. 21-26.
@article{11f799e51d5346c28d03136f7663377f,
title = "Does the method of “securing the catheter” make any difference?",
abstract = "Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine whether commonly used methods of securing an indwelling catheter decrease the force transmission along the indwelling catheter to the bladder neck in response to an externally applied force. Materials and methods: A test apparatus was constructed to simulate key features of a catheter drainage system. A “bladder neck” was suspended from a force gauge, with an indwelling catheter inserted through it, tensioned with a urine drainage bag. The system was calibrated, and various methods of securement were tested, with the level of force transmitted to the bladder neck recorded. The methods of securement tested included: adhesive tape taped used a number of ways (including direct taping and a taped mesentery), and three commercially available devices. Results: Some securement devices were able to completely eliminate force transmission to the bladder neck (the Flexi-Trak and Grip-Lok devices). A taped mesentery performed well reducing the transmitted force by up to 85{\%} compared with an unsecured control. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study we were able to demonstrate that some of the commonly used methods of securing indwelling catheters do work. We were also able to show that adhesive tape was still effective, although not as effective as commercially available devices.",
keywords = "catheter securement, movement induced trauma, patient safety, Urethral trauma, urinary catheter",
author = "Macneil, {James W. H.} and Wilkins, {Rachel G.} and Taylor, {Russell P.} and Lau, {Howard M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/2051415817707156",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "21--26",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Urology",
issn = "2051-4158",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

Does the method of “securing the catheter” make any difference? / Macneil, James W. H.; Wilkins, Rachel G.; Taylor, Russell P.; Lau, Howard M.

In: Journal of Clinical Urology, Vol. 11, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 21-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does the method of “securing the catheter” make any difference?

AU - Macneil, James W. H.

AU - Wilkins, Rachel G.

AU - Taylor, Russell P.

AU - Lau, Howard M.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine whether commonly used methods of securing an indwelling catheter decrease the force transmission along the indwelling catheter to the bladder neck in response to an externally applied force. Materials and methods: A test apparatus was constructed to simulate key features of a catheter drainage system. A “bladder neck” was suspended from a force gauge, with an indwelling catheter inserted through it, tensioned with a urine drainage bag. The system was calibrated, and various methods of securement were tested, with the level of force transmitted to the bladder neck recorded. The methods of securement tested included: adhesive tape taped used a number of ways (including direct taping and a taped mesentery), and three commercially available devices. Results: Some securement devices were able to completely eliminate force transmission to the bladder neck (the Flexi-Trak and Grip-Lok devices). A taped mesentery performed well reducing the transmitted force by up to 85% compared with an unsecured control. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study we were able to demonstrate that some of the commonly used methods of securing indwelling catheters do work. We were also able to show that adhesive tape was still effective, although not as effective as commercially available devices.

AB - Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine whether commonly used methods of securing an indwelling catheter decrease the force transmission along the indwelling catheter to the bladder neck in response to an externally applied force. Materials and methods: A test apparatus was constructed to simulate key features of a catheter drainage system. A “bladder neck” was suspended from a force gauge, with an indwelling catheter inserted through it, tensioned with a urine drainage bag. The system was calibrated, and various methods of securement were tested, with the level of force transmitted to the bladder neck recorded. The methods of securement tested included: adhesive tape taped used a number of ways (including direct taping and a taped mesentery), and three commercially available devices. Results: Some securement devices were able to completely eliminate force transmission to the bladder neck (the Flexi-Trak and Grip-Lok devices). A taped mesentery performed well reducing the transmitted force by up to 85% compared with an unsecured control. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study we were able to demonstrate that some of the commonly used methods of securing indwelling catheters do work. We were also able to show that adhesive tape was still effective, although not as effective as commercially available devices.

KW - catheter securement

KW - movement induced trauma

KW - patient safety

KW - Urethral trauma

KW - urinary catheter

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038825782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2051415817707156

DO - 10.1177/2051415817707156

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 21

EP - 26

JO - Journal of Clinical Urology

T2 - Journal of Clinical Urology

JF - Journal of Clinical Urology

SN - 2051-4158

IS - 1

ER -