Doi Moi in review: The challenges of building market socialism in Vietnam

Melanie Beresford

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Two decades ago the Vietnamese Communist Party embarked on a transformation from central planning towards a "socialist market economy under state guidance." It looked to East Asian development models, particularly the role of state enterprises (SEs), combined with the creation of a "civilised and equitable" society. The article argues that, in the case of SEs, the state's inability, especially under donor pressure, to provide crucial investment support to the SEs meant that foreign investors and the domestic non-state sector began to dominate the economic landscape. While state-led development remains feasible, it requires a clear and more authoritative industry policy; otherwise, the balance of interventionism could eventually tip towards cronyism. Further, the vagueness of the term "civilised and equitable" society leaves open both conformity with the post-Washington consensus and the possibility to achieve more aggressive redistributive measures, including redistribution of power. In practice, inclusion in and exclusion from successful public-private networks has been crucial for the capacity of individuals to participate in the rising prosperity of the market economy and has driven a process of rising regional inequality and the emergence of a new social class structure.

LanguageEnglish
Pages221-243
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Contemporary Asia
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2008

Fingerprint

market socialism
Vietnam
market economy
interventionism
open society
communist party
development model
conformity
prosperity
redistribution
social class
investor
exclusion
inclusion
planning
industry
economics

Keywords

  • Distribution of income
  • East Asian development
  • Industry policy
  • Socialism
  • Transition economies

Cite this

@article{eef2e7facbbf4920acdf3c51f7bbb903,
title = "Doi Moi in review: The challenges of building market socialism in Vietnam",
abstract = "Two decades ago the Vietnamese Communist Party embarked on a transformation from central planning towards a {"}socialist market economy under state guidance.{"} It looked to East Asian development models, particularly the role of state enterprises (SEs), combined with the creation of a {"}civilised and equitable{"} society. The article argues that, in the case of SEs, the state's inability, especially under donor pressure, to provide crucial investment support to the SEs meant that foreign investors and the domestic non-state sector began to dominate the economic landscape. While state-led development remains feasible, it requires a clear and more authoritative industry policy; otherwise, the balance of interventionism could eventually tip towards cronyism. Further, the vagueness of the term {"}civilised and equitable{"} society leaves open both conformity with the post-Washington consensus and the possibility to achieve more aggressive redistributive measures, including redistribution of power. In practice, inclusion in and exclusion from successful public-private networks has been crucial for the capacity of individuals to participate in the rising prosperity of the market economy and has driven a process of rising regional inequality and the emergence of a new social class structure.",
keywords = "Distribution of income, East Asian development, Industry policy, Socialism, Transition economies",
author = "Melanie Beresford",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1080/00472330701822314",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "221--243",
journal = "Journal of Contemporary Asia",
issn = "0047-2336",
publisher = "Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group",
number = "2",

}

Doi Moi in review : The challenges of building market socialism in Vietnam. / Beresford, Melanie.

In: Journal of Contemporary Asia, Vol. 38, No. 2, 05.2008, p. 221-243.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Doi Moi in review

T2 - Journal of Contemporary Asia

AU - Beresford, Melanie

PY - 2008/5

Y1 - 2008/5

N2 - Two decades ago the Vietnamese Communist Party embarked on a transformation from central planning towards a "socialist market economy under state guidance." It looked to East Asian development models, particularly the role of state enterprises (SEs), combined with the creation of a "civilised and equitable" society. The article argues that, in the case of SEs, the state's inability, especially under donor pressure, to provide crucial investment support to the SEs meant that foreign investors and the domestic non-state sector began to dominate the economic landscape. While state-led development remains feasible, it requires a clear and more authoritative industry policy; otherwise, the balance of interventionism could eventually tip towards cronyism. Further, the vagueness of the term "civilised and equitable" society leaves open both conformity with the post-Washington consensus and the possibility to achieve more aggressive redistributive measures, including redistribution of power. In practice, inclusion in and exclusion from successful public-private networks has been crucial for the capacity of individuals to participate in the rising prosperity of the market economy and has driven a process of rising regional inequality and the emergence of a new social class structure.

AB - Two decades ago the Vietnamese Communist Party embarked on a transformation from central planning towards a "socialist market economy under state guidance." It looked to East Asian development models, particularly the role of state enterprises (SEs), combined with the creation of a "civilised and equitable" society. The article argues that, in the case of SEs, the state's inability, especially under donor pressure, to provide crucial investment support to the SEs meant that foreign investors and the domestic non-state sector began to dominate the economic landscape. While state-led development remains feasible, it requires a clear and more authoritative industry policy; otherwise, the balance of interventionism could eventually tip towards cronyism. Further, the vagueness of the term "civilised and equitable" society leaves open both conformity with the post-Washington consensus and the possibility to achieve more aggressive redistributive measures, including redistribution of power. In practice, inclusion in and exclusion from successful public-private networks has been crucial for the capacity of individuals to participate in the rising prosperity of the market economy and has driven a process of rising regional inequality and the emergence of a new social class structure.

KW - Distribution of income

KW - East Asian development

KW - Industry policy

KW - Socialism

KW - Transition economies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38649113877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00472330701822314

DO - 10.1080/00472330701822314

M3 - Review article

VL - 38

SP - 221

EP - 243

JO - Journal of Contemporary Asia

JF - Journal of Contemporary Asia

SN - 0047-2336

IS - 2

ER -