Downstream mixing of sediment and tracers in agricultural catchments: evidence of changing sediment sources and fluvial processes?

Timothy Ralph, Adam Wethered, Hugh G. Smith, Henk Heijnis

    Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstract

    46 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Land clearance, soil tillage and grazing in agricultural catchments have liberated sediment and altered hydrological connectivity between hillslopes and channels, leading to increased sediment availability, mobilisation and delivery to rivers. The type and amount of sediment supplied to rivers is critical for fluvial geomorphology and aquatic ecosystem health. Contemporary sediment dynamics are routinely investigated using environmental radionuclides such as caesium 137 (Cs-137) and excess lead-210 (Pb-210ex), which can provide information regarding sediment source types and fluvial processes if sediment sources can be distinguished from one another and mixing models applied to representative samples. However, downstream transport, mixing and dilution of radionuclide labelled sediment (especially from sources with low initial concentrations) can obliterate the tracer signal; sometimes before anything of geomorphological importance happens in the catchment. Can these findings be used as evidence of sediment source variations and fluvial processes when the limits of detection (of Cs-137 in particular) are being exceeded so rapidly downstream? Sediment sources and downstream sediment dynamics were investigated in Coolbaggie Creek, a major supplier of sediment to the Macquarie River in an agricultural catchment with temperate to semi-arid climate in Australia. Radionuclides were used to discriminate between the <63 micron fraction of sediment sources including forested topsoils (Cs-137 11.28 +/- 0.75 Bq/kg; Pb-210ex 181.87 +/- 20.00 Bq/kg), agricultural topsoils (Cs-137 3.21 +/- 0.26 Bq/kg; Pb-210ex 29.59 +/- 10.94 Bq/kg) and sub-soils from channel banks and gullies (Cs-137 1.45 +/- 0.47 Bq/kg; Pb-210ex 4.67 +/- 1.93 Bq/kg).Within the trunk stream, suspended sediment, organic matter and Cs-137 and Pb-210ex concentrations declined downstream. Results from a mixing model suggest that agricultural topsoils account for 95% of fine sediment entering the channel in the upper reach (<10 km long), while sub-soils account for 90 to 100% of sediment entering and being transported in the remaining 50 km of the system. This shift in dominant sediment source material coincided with a large increase in channel cross sectional area (20 to >200 m2) downstream, with channel expansion and gullies contributing fine sediment to the system. A lack of topsoil being supplied to the channel suggests minimal lateral connectivity between the catchment and the trunk stream in all areas apart from the upper catchment. The enlargement and entrenchment of the channel downstream has also resulted in lateral disconnection between the channel and floodplain. In this case, a rapid reduction in radionuclide concentrations downstream does coincide with hydrogeomorphic changes, supporting their use for studying short-term sediment dynamics. These findings highlight the importance of understanding hydrogeomorphic processes and connectivity when interpreting sediment source and tracer data.
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages1
    Publication statusPublished - 27 Apr 2014
    EventEuropean Geosciences Union General Assembly 2014 - Vienna, Austria
    Duration: 27 Apr 20142 May 2014

    Conference

    ConferenceEuropean Geosciences Union General Assembly 2014
    Abbreviated titleEGU 2014
    Country/TerritoryAustria
    CityVienna
    Period27/04/142/05/14

    Bibliographical note

    Copyright the Author(s) 2013. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Downstream mixing of sediment and tracers in agricultural catchments: evidence of changing sediment sources and fluvial processes?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this