Drug addiction and criminal responsibility

Jeanette Kennett, Nicole A. Vincent, Anke Snoek

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Recent studies reveal some of the neurophysiological mechanisms involved in drug addiction. This prompts some theorists to claim that drug addiction diminishes responsibility. Stephen Morse however rejects this claim. Morse argues that these studies show that drug addiction involves neither compulsion, coercion, nor irrationality. He also adds that addicted people are responsible for becoming addicted and for failing to take measures to manage their addiction. After summarizing relevant neuroscience of addiction literature, this chapter engages critically with Morse to argue that a subgroup of addicted people does meet plausible criteria for compulsion, coercion, or irrationality; that few addicted people are fully responsible for becoming addicted; and that some addicted people can be at least partly excused for failing to manage their addiction. Pickard and Lacey’s “responsibility without blame” approach is also suggested as a fruitful basis for future work in this field.

LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationHandbook of Neuroethics
EditorsJens Clausen, Neil Levy
Place of PublicationDordrecht
PublisherSpringer, Springer Nature
Pages1065-1084
Number of pages20
ISBN (Electronic)9789400747074
ISBN (Print)9789400747067
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2015

Fingerprint

drug abuse
drug dependence
Substance-Related Disorders
Coercion
addiction
compulsion
responsibility
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Neurosciences
neurophysiology
neurosciences
Addiction
Drug Addiction
Criminal Responsibility
Responsibility
Irrationality

Cite this

Kennett, J., Vincent, N. A., & Snoek, A. (2015). Drug addiction and criminal responsibility. In J. Clausen, & N. Levy (Eds.), Handbook of Neuroethics (pp. 1065-1084). Dordrecht: Springer, Springer Nature. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_71
Kennett, Jeanette ; Vincent, Nicole A. ; Snoek, Anke. / Drug addiction and criminal responsibility. Handbook of Neuroethics. editor / Jens Clausen ; Neil Levy. Dordrecht : Springer, Springer Nature, 2015. pp. 1065-1084
@inbook{ce7bda7ae510477ebca072b5db17631d,
title = "Drug addiction and criminal responsibility",
abstract = "Recent studies reveal some of the neurophysiological mechanisms involved in drug addiction. This prompts some theorists to claim that drug addiction diminishes responsibility. Stephen Morse however rejects this claim. Morse argues that these studies show that drug addiction involves neither compulsion, coercion, nor irrationality. He also adds that addicted people are responsible for becoming addicted and for failing to take measures to manage their addiction. After summarizing relevant neuroscience of addiction literature, this chapter engages critically with Morse to argue that a subgroup of addicted people does meet plausible criteria for compulsion, coercion, or irrationality; that few addicted people are fully responsible for becoming addicted; and that some addicted people can be at least partly excused for failing to manage their addiction. Pickard and Lacey’s “responsibility without blame” approach is also suggested as a fruitful basis for future work in this field.",
author = "Jeanette Kennett and Vincent, {Nicole A.} and Anke Snoek",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_71",
language = "English",
isbn = "9789400747067",
pages = "1065--1084",
editor = "Jens Clausen and Neil Levy",
booktitle = "Handbook of Neuroethics",
publisher = "Springer, Springer Nature",
address = "United States",

}

Kennett, J, Vincent, NA & Snoek, A 2015, Drug addiction and criminal responsibility. in J Clausen & N Levy (eds), Handbook of Neuroethics. Springer, Springer Nature, Dordrecht, pp. 1065-1084. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_71

Drug addiction and criminal responsibility. / Kennett, Jeanette; Vincent, Nicole A.; Snoek, Anke.

Handbook of Neuroethics. ed. / Jens Clausen; Neil Levy. Dordrecht : Springer, Springer Nature, 2015. p. 1065-1084.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Drug addiction and criminal responsibility

AU - Kennett,Jeanette

AU - Vincent,Nicole A.

AU - Snoek,Anke

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Recent studies reveal some of the neurophysiological mechanisms involved in drug addiction. This prompts some theorists to claim that drug addiction diminishes responsibility. Stephen Morse however rejects this claim. Morse argues that these studies show that drug addiction involves neither compulsion, coercion, nor irrationality. He also adds that addicted people are responsible for becoming addicted and for failing to take measures to manage their addiction. After summarizing relevant neuroscience of addiction literature, this chapter engages critically with Morse to argue that a subgroup of addicted people does meet plausible criteria for compulsion, coercion, or irrationality; that few addicted people are fully responsible for becoming addicted; and that some addicted people can be at least partly excused for failing to manage their addiction. Pickard and Lacey’s “responsibility without blame” approach is also suggested as a fruitful basis for future work in this field.

AB - Recent studies reveal some of the neurophysiological mechanisms involved in drug addiction. This prompts some theorists to claim that drug addiction diminishes responsibility. Stephen Morse however rejects this claim. Morse argues that these studies show that drug addiction involves neither compulsion, coercion, nor irrationality. He also adds that addicted people are responsible for becoming addicted and for failing to take measures to manage their addiction. After summarizing relevant neuroscience of addiction literature, this chapter engages critically with Morse to argue that a subgroup of addicted people does meet plausible criteria for compulsion, coercion, or irrationality; that few addicted people are fully responsible for becoming addicted; and that some addicted people can be at least partly excused for failing to manage their addiction. Pickard and Lacey’s “responsibility without blame” approach is also suggested as a fruitful basis for future work in this field.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944617748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_71

DO - 10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_71

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9789400747067

SP - 1065

EP - 1084

BT - Handbook of Neuroethics

PB - Springer, Springer Nature

CY - Dordrecht

ER -

Kennett J, Vincent NA, Snoek A. Drug addiction and criminal responsibility. In Clausen J, Levy N, editors, Handbook of Neuroethics. Dordrecht: Springer, Springer Nature. 2015. p. 1065-1084. Available from, DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_71