East Asian development states and global companies as partners of techno-industrial competitiveness

Sung Young Kim*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review


How have the developmentally oriented states of East Asia coped with the unprecedented levels of structural power that global companies now possess? This chapter argues that under conditions of intensifying knowledge-based competition, states with strategic industry objectives seek new ways of managing collaborative ties between public and private actors. The argument is developed by examining the development of the Korean telecommunications sector from the 1980s to the 2000s. The Korean state's relationship with the conglomerates or chaebol has increasingly been based on an equal partnership in which the chaebol themselves are expected to bear greater responsibility for promoting national techno-industrial competitiveness. These expectations have been translated into two main ways: (1) collaborating in state-sponsored efforts to promote the international standardization of Korean-developed technologies, and (2) providing initial markets for the innovations created by fledgling high-tech start-ups who provide crucial sources of innovation in the pursuit of the Korean state's emphasis on transitioning towards innovation-led development.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe handbook of global companies
EditorsJohn Mikler
Place of PublicationChichester, West Sussex, UK
PublisherJohn Wiley & Sons
Number of pages16
ISBN (Print)9780470673232
Publication statusPublished - 26 Mar 2013
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameHandbook of global policy series


  • developmental states
  • industry policy
  • conglomerates
  • chaebol
  • Samsung
  • LG
  • high-tech start-ups
  • Ministry of Information and Communication
  • telecommunications
  • East Asia
  • Korea


Dive into the research topics of 'East Asian development states and global companies as partners of techno-industrial competitiveness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this