Economic evaluation of Australian acute care accreditation (ACCREDIT-CBA (Acute))

study protocol for a mixed-method research project

Virginia Mumford*, David Greenfield, Reece Hinchcliff, Max Moldovan, Kevin Forde, Johanna I. Westbrook, Jeffrey Braithwaite

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)
9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: The Accreditation Collaborative for the Conduct of Research, Evaluation and Designated Investigations through Teamwork-Cost-Benefit Analysis (ACCREDIT-CBA (Acute)) study is designed to determine and make explicit the costs and benefits of Australian acute care accreditation and to determine the effectiveness of acute care accreditation in improving patient safety and quality of care. The cost-benefit analysis framework will be provided in the form of an interactive model for industry partners, health regulators and policy makers, accreditation agencies and acute care service providers. Methods and design: The study will use a mixedmethod approach to identify, quantify and monetise the costs and benefits of accreditation. Surveys, expert panels, focus groups, interviews and primary and secondary data analysis will be used in cross-sectional and case study designs. Ethics and dissemination: The University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee has approved this project (approval number HREC 10274). The results of the study will be reported via peer-reviewed publications, conferences and seminar resentations and will form part of a doctoral thesis.

Original languageEnglish
Article number002381
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalBMJ Open
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

    Fingerprint

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2013. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Cite this