Educator experiences with postgraduate psychology students exhibiting professional competence issues

E. Quinlan*, J. Collison, F. P. Deane, C. H. Gooi, J. Paparo

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Psychology training programs emphasize competencies like professional behavior, interpersonal skills, and emotional intelligence. Some students, known as students with problems of professional competence (SPPC), struggle in these areas. This study explored SPPC characteristics and educator experiences in managing them through semi-structured interviews with twelve Australian psychology educators. Thematic analysis revealed that SPPC often struggle with professional attitudes, feedback integration, reflective skills, and mental health, placing demands on resources and contributing to educator stress. The role of educators as gatekeepers, assessors, and evaluators also raises concerns about maintaining ethical standards. Findings highlight the need for better understanding, support, and strategies for managing SPPC to uphold ethical standards.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)277–295
Number of pages19
JournalEthics and Behavior
Volume35
Issue number4
Early online date23 Jun 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2024. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • higher education
  • competence
  • gatekeeping
  • professionalism
  • psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Educator experiences with postgraduate psychology students exhibiting professional competence issues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this