Effect of anaesthetic and choice of neuromuscular blocker on vagal control of heart rate under laboratory animal experimental conditions

Divya Sarma Kandukuri, Jacqueline K. Phillips, Mark Tahmindjis, Cara M. Hildreth*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Neuromuscular-blocking agents are commonly used in laboratory animal research settings. Due to actions of cholinergic receptors at locations other than the motor end-plate, these agents have a strong propensity to modulate autonomic outflow and may therefore not be desirable in studies examining autonomic function. This study aimed to compare the effect of two non-depolarizing neuromuscular-blocking agents, pancuronium and cisatracurium, on blood pressure, heart rate and non-invasive indices of autonomic function (heart rate variability, systolic blood pressure variability and baroreflex sensitivity) under two different types of anaesthesia in Lewis rats. Pancuronium produced a profound vagolytic response characterized by tachycardia, reduction in heart rate variability and baroreflex sensitivity under urethane anaesthesia, and with minimal effect under isoflurane anaesthesia. Conversely, cisatracurium produced no evidence of vagolytic action under either urethane or isoflurane anaesthesia. Therefore, for studies interested in examining autonomic function, particularly baroreflex or vagal function, neuromuscular blockade would be best achieved using cisatracurium.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)280-291
    Number of pages12
    JournalLaboratory Animals
    Volume52
    Issue number3
    Early online date1 Sept 2017
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2018

    Keywords

    • baroreceptor reflex
    • heart rate
    • neuromuscular blockade
    • parasympathetic nervous system

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of anaesthetic and choice of neuromuscular blocker on vagal control of heart rate under laboratory animal experimental conditions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this