Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive, individualised walking and education program for prevention of low back pain recurrence in adults: statistical analysis plan for the WalkBack randomised controlled trial

Natasha C Pocovi, Petra L Graham, Chung-Wei Christine Lin, Simon D. French, Jane Latimer, Dafna Merom, Anne Tiedemann, Christopher G. Maher, Johanna M. van Dongen, Ornella Clavisi, Mark J. Hancock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
74 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Exercise for the prevention of low back pain recurrences is recommended, but under-researched. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a walking program for preventing low back pain recurrence remains unknown. This a priori statistical analysis plan describes the methods of analysis for the WalkBack trial.

Methods: WalkBack is a prospectively registered, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. The aim is to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a 6-month progressive and individualised walking and education program (intervention) for the prevention of low back pain recurrences, compared to a no-treatment control group. The primary outcome is days to the first recurrence of an episode of activity-limiting low back pain. Key secondary outcomes include days to any recurrence of low back pain, days to a care-seeking recurrence of low back pain, disability level, health-related quality of life, costs associated with low back pain and adverse events. All participants will be followed for a minimum of 12 months. Analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle. Cox regression is planned to assess the effects for the outcomes of time to activity-limiting, minimal and care-seeking recurrence. Hazard ratios and median survival times with 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. The effect of the intervention on continuous outcomes will be estimated with repeated-measure linear mixed models. An economic evaluation will be performed from the societal perspective for recurrence prevented (yes/no) and quality-adjusted life years. The proportion of adverse events between groups will be compared using Fisher's exact test.

Discussion: The WalkBack trial will provide evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a walking intervention to prevent low back pain recurrences. This statistical analysis plan provides transparency on the analysis of the trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: WalkBack - Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive individualised walking and education program for the prevention of a recurrence of low back pain. ACTRN12619001134112 . Date Registered: 14/08/2019.

Original languageEnglish
Article number197
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalTrials
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Mar 2023

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2023. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Adult
  • Low Back Pain/diagnosis
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Quality of Life
  • Walking
  • Exercise
  • Prevention
  • Statistical analysis plan
  • Low back pain
  • Randomised-controlled trial

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive, individualised walking and education program for prevention of low back pain recurrence in adults: statistical analysis plan for the WalkBack randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • WalkBack: Preventing recurrence of low back pain: Is walking the best approach?

    Hancock, M. (Primary Chief Investigator), Latimer, J. (Chief Investigator), Lin, C. W. C. (Chief Investigator), Merom, D. (Chief Investigator), vanTulder, M. W. (Chief Investigator), Maher, C. (Associate Investigator), Clavisi, O. (Associate Investigator), MacAskill, P. (Associate Investigator) & Tiedemann, A. (Associate Investigator)

    1/01/1931/12/22

    Project: Research

Cite this