TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of peer-led training on academic self-efficacy, study strategies, and academic performance for first-year university students with and without reading difficulties
AU - Bergey, Bradley W.
AU - Parrila, Rauno K.
AU - Laroche, Annie
AU - Deacon, S. Hélène
PY - 2019/1
Y1 - 2019/1
N2 - We examined how participation in peer-led study strategies training for first-year university students was associated with changes in academic self-efficacy and self-reported study strategies as well as with use of support services, academic achievement, and persistence. We examined potential differences for students with (n = 297) and without (n = 677) a history of reading difficulties, since reading difficulty is an indicator of academic vulnerability. Results from a randomized control trial revealed positive effects of the intervention on academic self-efficacy and several aspects of study strategies for both groups of participants. There were no training effects on first-year academic performance or second-year retention for either group. Suggestions of differences in effects across groups emerged in two ways. For participants with a history of reading difficulty, training appeared to increase use of the accessibility center in the subsequent semester and for participants with no history of reading difficulty, training appeared to increase use of other support services. The study suggests the peer-led study strategies program holds promise as a cost-effective approach to supporting the study strategy development of university students with and without reading difficulties.
AB - We examined how participation in peer-led study strategies training for first-year university students was associated with changes in academic self-efficacy and self-reported study strategies as well as with use of support services, academic achievement, and persistence. We examined potential differences for students with (n = 297) and without (n = 677) a history of reading difficulties, since reading difficulty is an indicator of academic vulnerability. Results from a randomized control trial revealed positive effects of the intervention on academic self-efficacy and several aspects of study strategies for both groups of participants. There were no training effects on first-year academic performance or second-year retention for either group. Suggestions of differences in effects across groups emerged in two ways. For participants with a history of reading difficulty, training appeared to increase use of the accessibility center in the subsequent semester and for participants with no history of reading difficulty, training appeared to increase use of other support services. The study suggests the peer-led study strategies program holds promise as a cost-effective approach to supporting the study strategy development of university students with and without reading difficulties.
KW - reading difficulties
KW - learning disabilities
KW - study skills intervention
KW - self-efficacy, university students
KW - academic achievement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056493854&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.11.001
DO - 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.11.001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85056493854
VL - 56
SP - 25
EP - 39
JO - Contemporary Educational Psychology
JF - Contemporary Educational Psychology
SN - 0361-476X
ER -