TY - JOUR
T1 - Electromyography in the prognostication of recovery in patients with acute peripheral facial nerve palsy
T2 - a systematic review
AU - Petrides, George Andrew
AU - Hayler, Raymond
AU - Lee, Jennifer W.
AU - Jankelowitz, Stacey
AU - Low, Tsu-Hui (Hubert)
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - Objectives: Needle electromyography (EMG) may be used to characterise the severity of the injury in acute peripheral facial nerve palsy (FNP) to predict recovery and guide management, but its prognostic value and clinical utility remain controversial. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the role of EMG to prognosticate the recovery of facial motor function in patients with acute peripheral FNP. Design: A comprehensive search strategy was applied in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The main outcome measure was the accuracy of EMG in predicting long-term facial function at least 6 months following symptom onset. Results: Eleven studies were included comprising 3837 participants, with 91.6% of these diagnosed with Bell's palsy (BP). In BP patients, the positive predictive value and negative predictive value for a good outcome based on EMG findings ranged from 82.1% to 100% and 66.7% to 80.5%, respectively, with two out of three studies finding that EMG remained a significant predictor of the outcome on multivariate analysis. Three studies addressed the role of EMG in non-idiopathic FNP with two of these studies supporting EMG to predict prognosis. Conclusions: EMG is a useful tool to gain insight into the likely outcome to guide management decisions and counsel patients on their expectations, particularly in BP. However, given inconsistencies in its application and lack of evidence around non-idiopathic FNP, it should not currently be relied on to predict recovery. Ultimately, its prognostic value and widespread adoption are dependent on the implementation of a clear and standardised protocol in future high-quality studies and routine clinical settings.
AB - Objectives: Needle electromyography (EMG) may be used to characterise the severity of the injury in acute peripheral facial nerve palsy (FNP) to predict recovery and guide management, but its prognostic value and clinical utility remain controversial. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the role of EMG to prognosticate the recovery of facial motor function in patients with acute peripheral FNP. Design: A comprehensive search strategy was applied in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The main outcome measure was the accuracy of EMG in predicting long-term facial function at least 6 months following symptom onset. Results: Eleven studies were included comprising 3837 participants, with 91.6% of these diagnosed with Bell's palsy (BP). In BP patients, the positive predictive value and negative predictive value for a good outcome based on EMG findings ranged from 82.1% to 100% and 66.7% to 80.5%, respectively, with two out of three studies finding that EMG remained a significant predictor of the outcome on multivariate analysis. Three studies addressed the role of EMG in non-idiopathic FNP with two of these studies supporting EMG to predict prognosis. Conclusions: EMG is a useful tool to gain insight into the likely outcome to guide management decisions and counsel patients on their expectations, particularly in BP. However, given inconsistencies in its application and lack of evidence around non-idiopathic FNP, it should not currently be relied on to predict recovery. Ultimately, its prognostic value and widespread adoption are dependent on the implementation of a clear and standardised protocol in future high-quality studies and routine clinical settings.
KW - bell palsy
KW - electromyography
KW - electrophysiology
KW - facial nerve injuries
KW - facial palsy
KW - prognosis
KW - recovery of function
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85157990837&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/coa.14072
DO - 10.1111/coa.14072
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37118939
AN - SCOPUS:85157990837
SN - 1749-4478
VL - 48
SP - 563
EP - 575
JO - Clinical Otolaryngology
JF - Clinical Otolaryngology
IS - 4
ER -