Eliciting autobiographical pseudomemories

The relevance of hypnosis, hypnotizability, and attributions

Richard A. Bryant*, Amanda J. Barnier

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors investigated the roles of hypnosis, hypnotizability, and attributions in autobiographical pseudomemories. Experiment 1 administered a suggestion for recall of their second birthday to hypnotized high and low hypnotizable participants and nonhypnotized, high hypnotizable participants; Experiment 2 administered a similar suggestion to real and simulating participants. Recall was tested during hypnosis, after hypnosis, and after a challenge procedure. In Experiment 1, more highs than lows reported a memory during hypnosis; however, following the challenge, half the waking highs but none of the hypnosis highs retracted their memory. Notably, highs attributed their memories to reconstructions based on other birthdays. In Experiment 2, whereas an equal number of reals and simulators reported a memory of their second birthday during hypnosis and then retracted following the challenge, they made different attributions about their memories. These findings highlight the value of a closer investigation of attributional processes that reconcile believed-in autobiographical memories with conflicting evidence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)267-283
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
Volume47
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Eliciting autobiographical pseudomemories: The relevance of hypnosis, hypnotizability, and attributions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this