Emotional engagement and moral evaluation: exploring cinematic ethics

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Film theory traditionally has been wary of cinema’s ethical potential, treating it as a deceptive medium requiring theoretical analysis and ethico-political critique. Although philosophers of film have recently begun exploring the question of ethics and cinema, there is surprisingly little consensus on what this means. How do movies express ethical ideas? How can they reveal the complexities of a moral situation? What kind of ethical experience can cinema evoke? I explore these questions in this chapter, focusing on the role of emotional engagement and moral evaluation. I suggest that the prevailing model of emotional engagement/moral evaluation—associated with theorists such as Noël Carroll, Carl Plantinga, and Murray Smith—should be supplemented by an account of emotional estrangement and moral-cognitive dissonance, and show how these processes contribute to ethical experience by analysing a key scene from Michael Haneke’s film, Amour [2012].
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationSocial aesthetics and moral judgment
Subtitle of host publicationpleasure, reflection and accountability
EditorsJennifer A. McMahon
Place of PublicationNew York ; London
PublisherRoutledge, Taylor and Francis Group
Chapter11
Pages196-212
Number of pages17
ISBN (Electronic)9781315148496, 9781351373333
ISBN (Print)9781138553262
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Moral Evaluation
Emotion
Cinema
Noel Carroll
Cognitive Dissonance
Movies
Estrangement
Philosopher
Theorists
Film Theory

Cite this

Sinnerbrink, R. (2018). Emotional engagement and moral evaluation: exploring cinematic ethics. In J. A. McMahon (Ed.), Social aesthetics and moral judgment: pleasure, reflection and accountability (pp. 196-212). New York ; London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
Sinnerbrink, Robert. / Emotional engagement and moral evaluation : exploring cinematic ethics. Social aesthetics and moral judgment: pleasure, reflection and accountability. editor / Jennifer A. McMahon. New York ; London : Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 2018. pp. 196-212
@inbook{166bd8e802404f22b5fc6cb23bdbeec4,
title = "Emotional engagement and moral evaluation: exploring cinematic ethics",
abstract = "Film theory traditionally has been wary of cinema’s ethical potential, treating it as a deceptive medium requiring theoretical analysis and ethico-political critique. Although philosophers of film have recently begun exploring the question of ethics and cinema, there is surprisingly little consensus on what this means. How do movies express ethical ideas? How can they reveal the complexities of a moral situation? What kind of ethical experience can cinema evoke? I explore these questions in this chapter, focusing on the role of emotional engagement and moral evaluation. I suggest that the prevailing model of emotional engagement/moral evaluation—associated with theorists such as No{\"e}l Carroll, Carl Plantinga, and Murray Smith—should be supplemented by an account of emotional estrangement and moral-cognitive dissonance, and show how these processes contribute to ethical experience by analysing a key scene from Michael Haneke’s film, Amour [2012].",
author = "Robert Sinnerbrink",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781138553262",
pages = "196--212",
editor = "McMahon, {Jennifer A. }",
booktitle = "Social aesthetics and moral judgment",
publisher = "Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Sinnerbrink, R 2018, Emotional engagement and moral evaluation: exploring cinematic ethics. in JA McMahon (ed.), Social aesthetics and moral judgment: pleasure, reflection and accountability. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, New York ; London, pp. 196-212.

Emotional engagement and moral evaluation : exploring cinematic ethics. / Sinnerbrink, Robert.

Social aesthetics and moral judgment: pleasure, reflection and accountability. ed. / Jennifer A. McMahon. New York ; London : Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 2018. p. 196-212.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Emotional engagement and moral evaluation

T2 - exploring cinematic ethics

AU - Sinnerbrink,Robert

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Film theory traditionally has been wary of cinema’s ethical potential, treating it as a deceptive medium requiring theoretical analysis and ethico-political critique. Although philosophers of film have recently begun exploring the question of ethics and cinema, there is surprisingly little consensus on what this means. How do movies express ethical ideas? How can they reveal the complexities of a moral situation? What kind of ethical experience can cinema evoke? I explore these questions in this chapter, focusing on the role of emotional engagement and moral evaluation. I suggest that the prevailing model of emotional engagement/moral evaluation—associated with theorists such as Noël Carroll, Carl Plantinga, and Murray Smith—should be supplemented by an account of emotional estrangement and moral-cognitive dissonance, and show how these processes contribute to ethical experience by analysing a key scene from Michael Haneke’s film, Amour [2012].

AB - Film theory traditionally has been wary of cinema’s ethical potential, treating it as a deceptive medium requiring theoretical analysis and ethico-political critique. Although philosophers of film have recently begun exploring the question of ethics and cinema, there is surprisingly little consensus on what this means. How do movies express ethical ideas? How can they reveal the complexities of a moral situation? What kind of ethical experience can cinema evoke? I explore these questions in this chapter, focusing on the role of emotional engagement and moral evaluation. I suggest that the prevailing model of emotional engagement/moral evaluation—associated with theorists such as Noël Carroll, Carl Plantinga, and Murray Smith—should be supplemented by an account of emotional estrangement and moral-cognitive dissonance, and show how these processes contribute to ethical experience by analysing a key scene from Michael Haneke’s film, Amour [2012].

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781138553262

SP - 196

EP - 212

BT - Social aesthetics and moral judgment

PB - Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group

CY - New York ; London

ER -

Sinnerbrink R. Emotional engagement and moral evaluation: exploring cinematic ethics. In McMahon JA, editor, Social aesthetics and moral judgment: pleasure, reflection and accountability. New York ; London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. 2018. p. 196-212