Emotional intelligence and individual differences in affective processes underlying task-contingent conscientiousness

Amirali Minbashian*, Nadin Beckmann, Robert E. Wood

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Organisational researchers have recently begun to focus on the more dynamic aspects of personality in the workplace. The present study examines individual differences in the affective processes that underlie one such dynamic construct, task-contingent conscientiousness. Using experience sampling data collected over 3 weeks from 201 managers, we show (a) that individuals differ substantially from each other in the paths that connect task demand, positive and negative affect, and conscientious behaviour; (b) that these individual differences cohere to define person types or classes that represent meaningful differences in the extent to which task-contingent conscientiousness is mediated affectively; and (c) that emotional intelligence increases the likelihood of membership in classes that are characterised by affectively mediated effects. Theoretical implications of the findings are discussed with reference to the cognitive-affective personality system model, research on the consequences of affect in the workplace, and the literature on emotional intelligence. Practical applications are suggested for managers who wish to use personality assessment for developmental purposes, especially in relation to facilitating behavioural change.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1182-1196
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Organizational Behavior
Volume39
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • affect
  • cognitive-affective personality system
  • emotional intelligence
  • personality dynamics
  • task-contingent conscientiousness

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Emotional intelligence and individual differences in affective processes underlying task-contingent conscientiousness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this