Empiric validation of the Rural Australian Medical Undergraduate Scholarship 'rural background' criterion

Gillian A. Laven*, David Wilkinson, Justin J. Beilby, Heather J. McElroy

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)


Objective: Rural Australian Medical Undergraduate Scholarships (RAMUS) provide $10 000 per annum to selected medical students with a rural background. Eligibility criteria include having lived in a rural community for five consecutive or eight cumulative years. We sought to validate the above-specified criterion using data from the Australian National Rural Background Study. Design: National case control study stratified by jurisdiction. Participants: Two thousand four hundred and fourteen Australian-trained rural and urban general practitioners (GPs). Main outcome measure: Whether the RAMUS rural background criterion was met or not. Results: Doctors who met the RAMUS rural background criterion were more likely to be in rural practice (odds ratio = 2.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.97-3.18) than those who did not. This was true for all jurisdictions (except for the Northern Territory) and ranged from 1.95 for South Australia to 3.57 for Victoria. Conclusion: Rural GPs are more likely to fulfil the RAMUS rural background criterion, supporting the existence of the RAMUS scheme.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)137-141
Number of pages5
JournalAustralian Journal of Rural Health
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2005
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Empiric validation of the Rural Australian Medical Undergraduate Scholarship 'rural background' criterion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this