Abstract
Many employers belong to more than one employer association, and often to associations with different and sometimes conflicting policies on major aspects of industrial relations. In the case of national associations, dual membership may exist in associations which have high public profiles and widely publicised policies which are fundamentally distinct. This raises the following critical questions. First, how do employers with dual membership behave when confronted by their associations with conflicting policies? Second,what are the implications of dual membership for cohesion within and among employer associations? To address these questions, this study focuses on employers who belong to the Business Council of Australia and the Metal Trades Industry Association between 1983 and1995. During this period, these associations held strongly conflicting policies on bargaining structure. This paper examines the behaviour and attitudes of a selection of such members,towards the policies of these two associations on bargaining structure during these years
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Current Research in Industrial Relations |
Subtitle of host publication | Proceedings of the 11th AIRAANZ Conference |
Editors | Tom Bramble |
Place of Publication | Brisbane |
Publisher | The Association of Industrial Relations Academics in Australia and New Zealand (AIRAANZ) |
Pages | 340-348 |
Number of pages | 9 |
ISBN (Print) | 0959070915 |
Publication status | Published - 1997 |