Empowering authors via fairer copyright contract law

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The remuneration of Australian authors has been decreasing over the last few decades, partly due to unfair contracts between authors and publishers. At the same time, Australian copyright law appears to do nothing to address the problem. The freedom of contract doctrine that still prevails in Australian copyright contract law is not able to tackle the problem of unfair distribution of revenues effectively, and its shortcomings are not well addressed by either general contract law doctrines or collective bargaining in the publishing sector. This article argues that Australia should consider addressing the problem by introducing certain rights inalienability restrictions in copyright law that are available in a number of jurisdictions overseas. The article discusses the rationales of introducing such provisions under Australian copyright law, such as unequal bargaining power, the prediction problem, fairness and utilitarian approaches. It counters the arguments that alienability restrictions are ineffective, and refers to the most recent empirical studies that show the ability of some alienability provisions to increase author remuneration.
LanguageEnglish
Pages681-718
Number of pages38
JournalUNSW law journal
Volume42
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Law
remuneration
doctrine
bargaining
bargaining power
overseas
fairness
jurisdiction
revenue
ability

Cite this

@article{410e260d43a5431cb4e5a791a7e2152b,
title = "Empowering authors via fairer copyright contract law",
abstract = "The remuneration of Australian authors has been decreasing over the last few decades, partly due to unfair contracts between authors and publishers. At the same time, Australian copyright law appears to do nothing to address the problem. The freedom of contract doctrine that still prevails in Australian copyright contract law is not able to tackle the problem of unfair distribution of revenues effectively, and its shortcomings are not well addressed by either general contract law doctrines or collective bargaining in the publishing sector. This article argues that Australia should consider addressing the problem by introducing certain rights inalienability restrictions in copyright law that are available in a number of jurisdictions overseas. The article discusses the rationales of introducing such provisions under Australian copyright law, such as unequal bargaining power, the prediction problem, fairness and utilitarian approaches. It counters the arguments that alienability restrictions are ineffective, and refers to the most recent empirical studies that show the ability of some alienability provisions to increase author remuneration.",
author = "Rita Matulionyte",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
doi = "10.2139/ssrn.3406472",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "681--718",
journal = "UNSW law journal",
issn = "0313-0096",
publisher = "Law School, University of New South Wales",
number = "2",

}

Empowering authors via fairer copyright contract law. / Matulionyte, Rita.

In: UNSW law journal, Vol. 42, No. 2, 06.2019, p. 681-718.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Empowering authors via fairer copyright contract law

AU - Matulionyte, Rita

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - The remuneration of Australian authors has been decreasing over the last few decades, partly due to unfair contracts between authors and publishers. At the same time, Australian copyright law appears to do nothing to address the problem. The freedom of contract doctrine that still prevails in Australian copyright contract law is not able to tackle the problem of unfair distribution of revenues effectively, and its shortcomings are not well addressed by either general contract law doctrines or collective bargaining in the publishing sector. This article argues that Australia should consider addressing the problem by introducing certain rights inalienability restrictions in copyright law that are available in a number of jurisdictions overseas. The article discusses the rationales of introducing such provisions under Australian copyright law, such as unequal bargaining power, the prediction problem, fairness and utilitarian approaches. It counters the arguments that alienability restrictions are ineffective, and refers to the most recent empirical studies that show the ability of some alienability provisions to increase author remuneration.

AB - The remuneration of Australian authors has been decreasing over the last few decades, partly due to unfair contracts between authors and publishers. At the same time, Australian copyright law appears to do nothing to address the problem. The freedom of contract doctrine that still prevails in Australian copyright contract law is not able to tackle the problem of unfair distribution of revenues effectively, and its shortcomings are not well addressed by either general contract law doctrines or collective bargaining in the publishing sector. This article argues that Australia should consider addressing the problem by introducing certain rights inalienability restrictions in copyright law that are available in a number of jurisdictions overseas. The article discusses the rationales of introducing such provisions under Australian copyright law, such as unequal bargaining power, the prediction problem, fairness and utilitarian approaches. It counters the arguments that alienability restrictions are ineffective, and refers to the most recent empirical studies that show the ability of some alienability provisions to increase author remuneration.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068374654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2139/ssrn.3406472

DO - 10.2139/ssrn.3406472

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 681

EP - 718

JO - UNSW law journal

T2 - UNSW law journal

JF - UNSW law journal

SN - 0313-0096

IS - 2

ER -