Enchantment in business ethics research

Emma Bell*, Nik Winchester, Edward Wray-Bliss

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article draws attention to the importance of enchantment in business ethics research. Starting from a Weberian understanding of disenchantment, as a force that arises through modernity and scientific rationality, we show how rationalist business ethics research has become disenchanted as a consequence of the normalization of positivist, quantitative methods of inquiry. Such methods absent the relational and lively nature of business ethics research and detract from the ethical meaning that can be generated through research encounters. To address this issue, we draw on the work of political theorist and philosopher, Jane Bennett, using this to show how interpretive qualitative research creates possibilities for enchantment. We identify three opportunities for reenchanting business ethics research related to: (i) moments of novelty or disruption; (ii) deep, meaningful attachments to things studied; and (iii) possibilities for embodied, affective encounters. In conclusion, we suggest that business ethics research needs to recognize and reorient scholarship towards an appreciation of the ethical value of interpretive, qualitative research as a source of potential enchantment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)251-262
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume174
Issue number2
Early online date12 Aug 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2021

Bibliographical note

Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • Enchantment
  • Interpretivism
  • Methodology
  • Qualitative research
  • Scientism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Enchantment in business ethics research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this