Abstract
Several prominent models of reading posit that attention is distributed to support the parallel lexical processing of multiple words. We contend that the auxiliary assumptions underlying this attention-gradient hypothesis are not well founded. Here, we address three specific issues related to the ongoing debate about attention allocation during reading: (i) why the attention-gradient hypothesis is widely endorsed, (ii) why processing several words in parallel in reading is implausible and (iii) why attention must be allocated to only one word at a time. Full consideration of these arguments supports the hypothesis that attention is allocated serially during reading.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 115-119 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Trends in Cognitive Sciences |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2009 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver