Endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: state of the art

James May*, Geoffrey H. White, John P. Harris

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalShort surveypeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)


This paper considers the historical aspects of endovascular aneursym repair; the major findings of our Departments experience over an 812-year period and reviews recent developments in endovascular prostheses. Analysis of 400 patients undergoing primary repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm between 1992 and 2000 revealed a perioperative mortality rate of 2.7% and primary conversion rate of 5%. With sequential studies it was shown that the outcome was better with bifurcated/aorto uni iliac grafts than tube grafts; better with second generation prostheses than first generation protheses and that survival in consecutive patients treated concurrently by open repair and endoluminal repair was superior in the endoluminal group. Endoluminal AAA repair is at a critical point of its development. It is unquestioned that it can dramatically reduce the need for intensive care and length of hospital stay and more recently it has been reported that survival is improved compared with open repair. The need for lifetime surveillance, the probability of graft failure and need for re-intervention, however, negate some of the advantages. The small incidence of unpredictable rupture following endoluminal AAA repair is a timely reminder of the need for continued careful follow-up.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)16-21
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Journal of Radiology
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes


  • Aortic aneurysm
  • Endoluminal repair
  • Endovascular


Dive into the research topics of 'Endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: state of the art'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this