English-only policy in an ELICOS setting: perspectives of teachers and students

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Contrary to growing multilingual theories of language learning, beliefs in the advantages of monolingual instruction in English teaching are widespread and often result in an English-only approach that rarely takes into account the perspectives of the parties involved. This article reports on a study that explored perceptions of a strict English-only policy and its impact on students and teachers in an Australian English Language Intensive Courses for Overseas Students (ELICOS) setting. In a mixed-methods approach, data from a student survey and group interviews with teachers revealed a discrepancy between generally positive beliefs about the policy and a mixed impact of its implementation in practice. The study also highlighted the limitations of framing a linguistic strategy as an official policy, including the potential for conflict between the teaching staff and the students. The findings have implications for language policy decisions in the wider ELICOS sector and support research on multilingual pedagogy and first language use in English teaching and learning.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)18-41
    Number of pages24
    JournalEnglish Australia Journal
    Volume35
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2019

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'English-only policy in an ELICOS setting: perspectives of teachers and students'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this