Enhanced accuracy and reproducibility in reporting of lung scintigrams by a segmental reference chart

John S. Magnussen, Peter Chicco, Amanda W. Palmer, Douglas W. Mackey, Michael Magee, I. Provan C Murray, George Bautovich, Kevin Allman, Geoffrey Storey, Hans Van Der Wall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The diagnostic probability of pulmonary embolic disease is based on the recognition of unmatched segmental perfusion defects. Although interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility have been studied, accuracy has been an elusive goal due to the lack of a gold standard. We investigated the accuracy and reproducibility of reporting in a virtual scintigraphic model of the lungs, with and without the use of a lung segmental reference chart. Methods: A Monte Carlo package was used to model lung scintigraphy from a digital phantom of the human lungs. An ideal lung segmental reference chart was created from the phantom. Five experienced nuclear medicine physicians reported a set of all possible defects involving 100% of a segment, without and with the chart. A further set of defects involving 45%-55% of a segment in the lower lobes was investigated using the chart. Results: There was a significant improvement in accuracy (from 48% to 72%) and intraobserver agreement (from 61% to 77%) with the chart. The accuracy of reporting defects in the upper and middle lobes was consistently better than that in the lower lobes. There was no significant difference between the accuracy of reporting large defects and that of reporting moderate defects in the lower lobes. Conclusion: The lung segmental reference chart significantly improves both the accuracy and reproducibility of reporting lung scintigrams; however, although reporting in the lung bases is improved, absolute accuracy is substantially less than that in the upper and middle lobes. This emphasizes the need for caution because the lung bases are the most common site of embolic disease.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1095-1099
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Nuclear Medicine
Volume39
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Lung
Monte Carlo Method
Nuclear Medicine
Radionuclide Imaging
Lung Diseases
Perfusion
Physicians

Keywords

  • Lung scintigraphy
  • Lung segmental reference chart
  • Monte Carlo simulation

Cite this

Magnussen, J. S., Chicco, P., Palmer, A. W., Mackey, D. W., Magee, M., Murray, I. P. C., ... Van Der Wall, H. (1998). Enhanced accuracy and reproducibility in reporting of lung scintigrams by a segmental reference chart. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 39(6), 1095-1099.
Magnussen, John S. ; Chicco, Peter ; Palmer, Amanda W. ; Mackey, Douglas W. ; Magee, Michael ; Murray, I. Provan C ; Bautovich, George ; Allman, Kevin ; Storey, Geoffrey ; Van Der Wall, Hans. / Enhanced accuracy and reproducibility in reporting of lung scintigrams by a segmental reference chart. In: Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 1998 ; Vol. 39, No. 6. pp. 1095-1099.
@article{fdec05dee0d04038bbce1a7b486bc9e0,
title = "Enhanced accuracy and reproducibility in reporting of lung scintigrams by a segmental reference chart",
abstract = "The diagnostic probability of pulmonary embolic disease is based on the recognition of unmatched segmental perfusion defects. Although interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility have been studied, accuracy has been an elusive goal due to the lack of a gold standard. We investigated the accuracy and reproducibility of reporting in a virtual scintigraphic model of the lungs, with and without the use of a lung segmental reference chart. Methods: A Monte Carlo package was used to model lung scintigraphy from a digital phantom of the human lungs. An ideal lung segmental reference chart was created from the phantom. Five experienced nuclear medicine physicians reported a set of all possible defects involving 100{\%} of a segment, without and with the chart. A further set of defects involving 45{\%}-55{\%} of a segment in the lower lobes was investigated using the chart. Results: There was a significant improvement in accuracy (from 48{\%} to 72{\%}) and intraobserver agreement (from 61{\%} to 77{\%}) with the chart. The accuracy of reporting defects in the upper and middle lobes was consistently better than that in the lower lobes. There was no significant difference between the accuracy of reporting large defects and that of reporting moderate defects in the lower lobes. Conclusion: The lung segmental reference chart significantly improves both the accuracy and reproducibility of reporting lung scintigrams; however, although reporting in the lung bases is improved, absolute accuracy is substantially less than that in the upper and middle lobes. This emphasizes the need for caution because the lung bases are the most common site of embolic disease.",
keywords = "Lung scintigraphy, Lung segmental reference chart, Monte Carlo simulation",
author = "Magnussen, {John S.} and Peter Chicco and Palmer, {Amanda W.} and Mackey, {Douglas W.} and Michael Magee and Murray, {I. Provan C} and George Bautovich and Kevin Allman and Geoffrey Storey and {Van Der Wall}, Hans",
year = "1998",
month = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "1095--1099",
journal = "Journal of Nuclear Medicine",
issn = "0161-5505",
publisher = "Society of Nuclear Medicine",
number = "6",

}

Magnussen, JS, Chicco, P, Palmer, AW, Mackey, DW, Magee, M, Murray, IPC, Bautovich, G, Allman, K, Storey, G & Van Der Wall, H 1998, 'Enhanced accuracy and reproducibility in reporting of lung scintigrams by a segmental reference chart' Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1095-1099.

Enhanced accuracy and reproducibility in reporting of lung scintigrams by a segmental reference chart. / Magnussen, John S.; Chicco, Peter; Palmer, Amanda W.; Mackey, Douglas W.; Magee, Michael; Murray, I. Provan C; Bautovich, George; Allman, Kevin; Storey, Geoffrey; Van Der Wall, Hans.

In: Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Vol. 39, No. 6, 06.1998, p. 1095-1099.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enhanced accuracy and reproducibility in reporting of lung scintigrams by a segmental reference chart

AU - Magnussen,John S.

AU - Chicco,Peter

AU - Palmer,Amanda W.

AU - Mackey,Douglas W.

AU - Magee,Michael

AU - Murray,I. Provan C

AU - Bautovich,George

AU - Allman,Kevin

AU - Storey,Geoffrey

AU - Van Der Wall,Hans

PY - 1998/6

Y1 - 1998/6

N2 - The diagnostic probability of pulmonary embolic disease is based on the recognition of unmatched segmental perfusion defects. Although interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility have been studied, accuracy has been an elusive goal due to the lack of a gold standard. We investigated the accuracy and reproducibility of reporting in a virtual scintigraphic model of the lungs, with and without the use of a lung segmental reference chart. Methods: A Monte Carlo package was used to model lung scintigraphy from a digital phantom of the human lungs. An ideal lung segmental reference chart was created from the phantom. Five experienced nuclear medicine physicians reported a set of all possible defects involving 100% of a segment, without and with the chart. A further set of defects involving 45%-55% of a segment in the lower lobes was investigated using the chart. Results: There was a significant improvement in accuracy (from 48% to 72%) and intraobserver agreement (from 61% to 77%) with the chart. The accuracy of reporting defects in the upper and middle lobes was consistently better than that in the lower lobes. There was no significant difference between the accuracy of reporting large defects and that of reporting moderate defects in the lower lobes. Conclusion: The lung segmental reference chart significantly improves both the accuracy and reproducibility of reporting lung scintigrams; however, although reporting in the lung bases is improved, absolute accuracy is substantially less than that in the upper and middle lobes. This emphasizes the need for caution because the lung bases are the most common site of embolic disease.

AB - The diagnostic probability of pulmonary embolic disease is based on the recognition of unmatched segmental perfusion defects. Although interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility have been studied, accuracy has been an elusive goal due to the lack of a gold standard. We investigated the accuracy and reproducibility of reporting in a virtual scintigraphic model of the lungs, with and without the use of a lung segmental reference chart. Methods: A Monte Carlo package was used to model lung scintigraphy from a digital phantom of the human lungs. An ideal lung segmental reference chart was created from the phantom. Five experienced nuclear medicine physicians reported a set of all possible defects involving 100% of a segment, without and with the chart. A further set of defects involving 45%-55% of a segment in the lower lobes was investigated using the chart. Results: There was a significant improvement in accuracy (from 48% to 72%) and intraobserver agreement (from 61% to 77%) with the chart. The accuracy of reporting defects in the upper and middle lobes was consistently better than that in the lower lobes. There was no significant difference between the accuracy of reporting large defects and that of reporting moderate defects in the lower lobes. Conclusion: The lung segmental reference chart significantly improves both the accuracy and reproducibility of reporting lung scintigrams; however, although reporting in the lung bases is improved, absolute accuracy is substantially less than that in the upper and middle lobes. This emphasizes the need for caution because the lung bases are the most common site of embolic disease.

KW - Lung scintigraphy

KW - Lung segmental reference chart

KW - Monte Carlo simulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031837713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 1095

EP - 1099

JO - Journal of Nuclear Medicine

T2 - Journal of Nuclear Medicine

JF - Journal of Nuclear Medicine

SN - 0161-5505

IS - 6

ER -