Ensuring best practice in genomics education and evaluation: reporting item standards for education and its evaluation in genomics (RISE2 Genomics)

Amy Nisselle; Monica Janinski; Melissa Martyn; Belinda McClaren; Nadia Kaunein; Reporting Item Standards for Education and its Evaluation in Genomics Expert Group; Kristine  Barlow-Stewart; Andrea  Belcher; John A. Bernat; Stephanie Best; Michelle Bishop; June C. Carroll; Martina Cornell; Vajira H. W. Dissanayake; Kate Dunlop; Gunjan Garg; Russell Gear; Debra Graves; Ken Knight; Bruce Korf; Dhavendra  Kumar; Mercy Laurino; Alan Ma; Jane Maguire; Andrew Mallett; Maria McCarthy; Alison McEwan; Nicola Mulder; Chirag Patel; Catherine Quinlan; Kate Reed; Erin Rooney Riggs; Ingrid Sinnerbrink; Anne Slavotinek; Vijayaprakash Suppiah; Bronwyn Terrill; Edward S. Tobias; Emma Tonkin; Steve Trumble; Tina-Marie Wessels; Sylvia Metcalfe; Helen Jordan; Clara Gaff

doi:10.1038/s41436-021-01140-x

Ensuring best practice in genomics education and evaluation: reporting item standards for education and its evaluation in genomics (RISE2 Genomics)

Amy Nisselle, Monica Janinski, Melissa Martyn, Belinda McClaren, Nadia Kaunein, Reporting Item Standards for Education and its Evaluation in Genomics Expert Group, Kristine Barlow-Stewart, Andrea Belcher, John A. Bernat, Stephanie Best, Michelle Bishop, June C. Carroll, Martina Cornell, Vajira H. W. Dissanayake, Kate Dunlop, Gunjan Garg, Russell Gear, Debra Graves, Ken Knight, Bruce KorfDhavendra Kumar, Mercy Laurino, Alan Ma, Jane Maguire, Andrew Mallett, Maria McCarthy, Alison McEwan, Nicola Mulder, Chirag Patel, Catherine Quinlan, Kate Reed, Erin Rooney Riggs, Ingrid Sinnerbrink, Anne Slavotinek, Vijayaprakash Suppiah, Bronwyn Terrill, Edward S. Tobias, Emma Tonkin, Steve Trumble, Tina-Marie Wessels, Sylvia Metcalfe, Helen Jordan, Clara Gaff^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Australian Institute of Health Innovation

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Widespread, quality genomics education for health professionals is required to create a competent genomic workforce. A lack of standards for reporting genomics education and evaluation limits the evidence base for replication and comparison. We therefore undertook a consensus process to develop a recommended minimum set of information to support consistent reporting of design, development, delivery, and evaluation of genomics education interventions.

Methods: Draft standards were derived from literature (25 items from 21 publications). Thirty-six international experts were purposively recruited for three rounds of a modified Delphi process to reach consensus on relevance, clarity, comprehensiveness, utility, and design.

Results: The final standards include 18 items relating to development and delivery of genomics education interventions, 12 relating to evaluation, and 1 on stakeholder engagement.

Conclusion: These Reporting Item Standards for Education and its Evaluation in Genomics (RISE2 Genomics) are intended to be widely applicable across settings and health professions. Their use by those involved in reporting genomics education interventions and evaluation, as well as adoption by journals and policy makers as the expected standard, will support greater transparency, consistency, and comprehensiveness of reporting. Consequently, the genomics education evidence base will be more robust, enabling high-quality education and evaluation across diverse settings.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1356–1365
Number of pages	10
Journal	Genetics in Medicine
Volume	23
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-021-01140-x
Publication status	Published - 1 Jul 2021

Access to Document

10.1038/s41436-021-01140-x

Cite this

Nisselle, A., Janinski, M., Martyn, M., McClaren, B., Kaunein, N., Reporting Item Standards for Education and its Evaluation in Genomics Expert Group, Barlow-Stewart, K., Belcher, A., Bernat, J. A., Best, S., Bishop, M., Carroll, J. C., Cornell, M., Dissanayake, V. H. W., Dunlop, K., Garg, G., Gear, R., Graves, D., Knight, K., ... Gaff, C. (2021). Ensuring best practice in genomics education and evaluation: reporting item standards for education and its evaluation in genomics (RISE2 Genomics). Genetics in Medicine, 23(7), 1356–1365 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-021-01140-x

Nisselle, Amy ; Janinski, Monica ; Martyn, Melissa ; McClaren, Belinda ; Kaunein, Nadia ; Reporting Item Standards for Education and its Evaluation in Genomics Expert Group ; Barlow-Stewart, Kristine ; Belcher, Andrea ; Bernat, John A. ; Best, Stephanie ; Bishop, Michelle ; Carroll, June C. ; Cornell, Martina ; Dissanayake, Vajira H. W. ; Dunlop, Kate ; Garg, Gunjan ; Gear, Russell ; Graves, Debra ; Knight, Ken ; Korf, Bruce ; Kumar, Dhavendra ; Laurino, Mercy ; Ma, Alan ; Maguire, Jane ; Mallett, Andrew ; McCarthy, Maria ; McEwan, Alison ; Mulder, Nicola ; Patel, Chirag ; Quinlan, Catherine ; Reed, Kate ; Rooney Riggs, Erin ; Sinnerbrink, Ingrid ; Slavotinek, Anne ; Suppiah, Vijayaprakash ; Terrill, Bronwyn ; Tobias, Edward S. ; Tonkin, Emma ; Trumble, Steve ; Wessels, Tina-Marie ; Metcalfe, Sylvia ; Jordan, Helen ; Gaff, Clara. / Ensuring best practice in genomics education and evaluation : reporting item standards for education and its evaluation in genomics (RISE2 Genomics). In: Genetics in Medicine. 2021 ; Vol. 23, No. 7. pp. 1356–1365 .

@article{300a490eee5849c78532510c1c890b98,

title = "Ensuring best practice in genomics education and evaluation: reporting item standards for education and its evaluation in genomics (RISE2 Genomics)",

abstract = "Purpose: Widespread, quality genomics education for health professionals is required to create a competent genomic workforce. A lack of standards for reporting genomics education and evaluation limits the evidence base for replication and comparison. We therefore undertook a consensus process to develop a recommended minimum set of information to support consistent reporting of design, development, delivery, and evaluation of genomics education interventions.Methods: Draft standards were derived from literature (25 items from 21 publications). Thirty-six international experts were purposively recruited for three rounds of a modified Delphi process to reach consensus on relevance, clarity, comprehensiveness, utility, and design.Results: The final standards include 18 items relating to development and delivery of genomics education interventions, 12 relating to evaluation, and 1 on stakeholder engagement.Conclusion: These Reporting Item Standards for Education and its Evaluation in Genomics (RISE2 Genomics) are intended to be widely applicable across settings and health professions. Their use by those involved in reporting genomics education interventions and evaluation, as well as adoption by journals and policy makers as the expected standard, will support greater transparency, consistency, and comprehensiveness of reporting. Consequently, the genomics education evidence base will be more robust, enabling high-quality education and evaluation across diverse settings.",

author = "Amy Nisselle and Monica Janinski and Melissa Martyn and Belinda McClaren and Nadia Kaunein and {Reporting Item Standards for Education and its Evaluation in Genomics Expert Group} and Kristine Barlow-Stewart and Andrea Belcher and Bernat, {John A.} and Stephanie Best and Michelle Bishop and Carroll, {June C.} and Martina Cornell and Dissanayake, {Vajira H. W.} and Kate Dunlop and Gunjan Garg and Russell Gear and Debra Graves and Ken Knight and Bruce Korf and Dhavendra Kumar and Mercy Laurino and Alan Ma and Jane Maguire and Andrew Mallett and Maria McCarthy and Alison McEwan and Nicola Mulder and Chirag Patel and Catherine Quinlan and Kate Reed and {Rooney Riggs}, Erin and Ingrid Sinnerbrink and Anne Slavotinek and Vijayaprakash Suppiah and Bronwyn Terrill and Tobias, {Edward S.} and Emma Tonkin and Steve Trumble and Tina-Marie Wessels and Sylvia Metcalfe and Helen Jordan and Clara Gaff",

year = "2021",

month = jul,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1038/s41436-021-01140-x",

language = "English",

volume = "23",

pages = "1356–1365 ",

journal = "Genetics in Medicine",

issn = "1098-3600",

publisher = "Springer, Springer Nature",

number = "7",

}

Nisselle, A, Janinski, M, Martyn, M, McClaren, B, Kaunein, N, Reporting Item Standards for Education and its Evaluation in Genomics Expert Group, Barlow-Stewart, K, Belcher, A, Bernat, JA, Best, S, Bishop, M, Carroll, JC, Cornell, M, Dissanayake, VHW, Dunlop, K, Garg, G, Gear, R, Graves, D, Knight, K, Korf, B, Kumar, D, Laurino, M, Ma, A, Maguire, J, Mallett, A, McCarthy, M, McEwan, A, Mulder, N, Patel, C, Quinlan, C, Reed, K, Rooney Riggs, E, Sinnerbrink, I, Slavotinek, A, Suppiah, V, Terrill, B, Tobias, ES, Tonkin, E, Trumble, S, Wessels, T-M, Metcalfe, S, Jordan, H & Gaff, C 2021, 'Ensuring best practice in genomics education and evaluation: reporting item standards for education and its evaluation in genomics (RISE2 Genomics)', Genetics in Medicine, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 1356–1365 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-021-01140-x

Ensuring best practice in genomics education and evaluation : reporting item standards for education and its evaluation in genomics (RISE2 Genomics). / Nisselle, Amy; Janinski, Monica; Martyn, Melissa; McClaren, Belinda; Kaunein, Nadia; Reporting Item Standards for Education and its Evaluation in Genomics Expert Group; Barlow-Stewart, Kristine ; Belcher, Andrea ; Bernat, John A.; Best, Stephanie; Bishop, Michelle; Carroll, June C.; Cornell, Martina; Dissanayake, Vajira H. W.; Dunlop, Kate; Garg, Gunjan; Gear, Russell; Graves, Debra; Knight, Ken; Korf, Bruce; Kumar, Dhavendra; Laurino, Mercy; Ma, Alan; Maguire, Jane; Mallett, Andrew; McCarthy, Maria; McEwan, Alison; Mulder, Nicola; Patel, Chirag; Quinlan, Catherine; Reed, Kate; Rooney Riggs, Erin; Sinnerbrink, Ingrid; Slavotinek, Anne; Suppiah, Vijayaprakash; Terrill, Bronwyn; Tobias, Edward S.; Tonkin, Emma; Trumble, Steve; Wessels, Tina-Marie; Metcalfe, Sylvia; Jordan, Helen; Gaff, Clara.

In: Genetics in Medicine, Vol. 23, No. 7, 01.07.2021, p. 1356–1365 .

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ensuring best practice in genomics education and evaluation

T2 - reporting item standards for education and its evaluation in genomics (RISE2 Genomics)

AU - Nisselle, Amy

AU - Janinski, Monica

AU - Martyn, Melissa

AU - McClaren, Belinda

AU - Kaunein, Nadia

AU - Reporting Item Standards for Education and its Evaluation in Genomics Expert Group

AU - Barlow-Stewart, Kristine

AU - Belcher, Andrea

AU - Bernat, John A.

AU - Best, Stephanie

AU - Bishop, Michelle

AU - Carroll, June C.

AU - Cornell, Martina

AU - Dissanayake, Vajira H. W.

AU - Dunlop, Kate

AU - Garg, Gunjan

AU - Gear, Russell

AU - Graves, Debra

AU - Knight, Ken

AU - Korf, Bruce

AU - Kumar, Dhavendra

AU - Laurino, Mercy

AU - Ma, Alan

AU - Maguire, Jane

AU - Mallett, Andrew

AU - McCarthy, Maria

AU - McEwan, Alison

AU - Mulder, Nicola

AU - Patel, Chirag

AU - Quinlan, Catherine

AU - Reed, Kate

AU - Rooney Riggs, Erin

AU - Sinnerbrink, Ingrid

AU - Slavotinek, Anne

AU - Suppiah, Vijayaprakash

AU - Terrill, Bronwyn

AU - Tobias, Edward S.

AU - Tonkin, Emma

AU - Trumble, Steve

AU - Wessels, Tina-Marie

AU - Metcalfe, Sylvia

AU - Jordan, Helen

AU - Gaff, Clara

PY - 2021/7/1

Y1 - 2021/7/1

N2 - Purpose: Widespread, quality genomics education for health professionals is required to create a competent genomic workforce. A lack of standards for reporting genomics education and evaluation limits the evidence base for replication and comparison. We therefore undertook a consensus process to develop a recommended minimum set of information to support consistent reporting of design, development, delivery, and evaluation of genomics education interventions.Methods: Draft standards were derived from literature (25 items from 21 publications). Thirty-six international experts were purposively recruited for three rounds of a modified Delphi process to reach consensus on relevance, clarity, comprehensiveness, utility, and design.Results: The final standards include 18 items relating to development and delivery of genomics education interventions, 12 relating to evaluation, and 1 on stakeholder engagement.Conclusion: These Reporting Item Standards for Education and its Evaluation in Genomics (RISE2 Genomics) are intended to be widely applicable across settings and health professions. Their use by those involved in reporting genomics education interventions and evaluation, as well as adoption by journals and policy makers as the expected standard, will support greater transparency, consistency, and comprehensiveness of reporting. Consequently, the genomics education evidence base will be more robust, enabling high-quality education and evaluation across diverse settings.

AB - Purpose: Widespread, quality genomics education for health professionals is required to create a competent genomic workforce. A lack of standards for reporting genomics education and evaluation limits the evidence base for replication and comparison. We therefore undertook a consensus process to develop a recommended minimum set of information to support consistent reporting of design, development, delivery, and evaluation of genomics education interventions.Methods: Draft standards were derived from literature (25 items from 21 publications). Thirty-six international experts were purposively recruited for three rounds of a modified Delphi process to reach consensus on relevance, clarity, comprehensiveness, utility, and design.Results: The final standards include 18 items relating to development and delivery of genomics education interventions, 12 relating to evaluation, and 1 on stakeholder engagement.Conclusion: These Reporting Item Standards for Education and its Evaluation in Genomics (RISE2 Genomics) are intended to be widely applicable across settings and health professions. Their use by those involved in reporting genomics education interventions and evaluation, as well as adoption by journals and policy makers as the expected standard, will support greater transparency, consistency, and comprehensiveness of reporting. Consequently, the genomics education evidence base will be more robust, enabling high-quality education and evaluation across diverse settings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112119836&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41436-021-01140-x

DO - 10.1038/s41436-021-01140-x

M3 - Article

C2 - 33824503

VL - 23

SP - 1356

EP - 1365

JO - Genetics in Medicine

JF - Genetics in Medicine

SN - 1098-3600

IS - 7

ER -

Nisselle A, Janinski M, Martyn M, McClaren B, Kaunein N, Reporting Item Standards for Education and its Evaluation in Genomics Expert Group et al. Ensuring best practice in genomics education and evaluation: reporting item standards for education and its evaluation in genomics (RISE2 Genomics). Genetics in Medicine. 2021 Jul 1;23(7):1356–1365 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-021-01140-x

Ensuring best practice in genomics education and evaluation: reporting item standards for education and its evaluation in genomics (RISE2 Genomics)

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this