Environmental Impact Assessment process for deep-sea mining in 'the Area'

Jennifer M. Durden, Laura E. Lallier, Kevin Murphy, Aline Jaeckel, Kristina Gjerde, Daniel O. B. Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is key to the robust environmental management of industrial projects; it is used to anticipate, assess and reduce environmental and social risks of a project. It is instrumental in project planning and execution, and often required for financing and regulatory approval to be granted. The International Seabed Authority currently requires an EIA for deep-sea mining (DSM) in areas beyond national jurisdiction (the Area), but the existing regulations present only a portion of a robust EIA process. This article presents an ideal EIA process for DSM, drawing upon the application of EIA from allied industries. It contains screening, scoping and assessment phases, along with the development of an environmental management plan. It also includes external review by experts, stakeholder consultation, and regulatory review. Lessons learned from application of EIA elsewhere are discussed in relation to DSM, including the integration of EIA into UK domestic law, and the reception of EIAs prepared for seabed ore extraction in the Exclusive Economic Zones of New Zealand and Papua New Guinea. Finally, four main challenges of implementing the EIA process to DSM in the Area are presented: 1) EIA process for DSM needs to incorporate mechanisms to address uncertainty; 2) detailed requirements for the EIA process phases should be made clear; 3) mechanisms are needed to ensure that the EIA influences decision making; and, 4) the EIA process requires substantial input and involvement from the regulator.
LanguageEnglish
Pages194–202
Number of pages9
JournalMarine Policy
Volume87
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2018

Fingerprint

environmental assessment
environmental impact assessment
environmental impact
environmental management
deep sea mining
Environmental impact assessment
Exclusive Economic Zone
project planning
Papua New Guinea
Papua-New Guinea
funding
stakeholders
decision making
stakeholder
jurisdiction
uncertainty
planning
New Zealand
screening
industry

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2017. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Cite this

Durden, J. M., Lallier, L. E., Murphy, K., Jaeckel, A., Gjerde, K., & Jones, D. O. B. (2018). Environmental Impact Assessment process for deep-sea mining in 'the Area'. Marine Policy, 87, 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.013
Durden, Jennifer M. ; Lallier, Laura E. ; Murphy, Kevin ; Jaeckel, Aline ; Gjerde, Kristina ; Jones, Daniel O. B. / Environmental Impact Assessment process for deep-sea mining in 'the Area'. In: Marine Policy. 2018 ; Vol. 87. pp. 194–202.
@article{2755fbecb0a749f5a6e638bc59af948c,
title = "Environmental Impact Assessment process for deep-sea mining in 'the Area'",
abstract = "Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is key to the robust environmental management of industrial projects; it is used to anticipate, assess and reduce environmental and social risks of a project. It is instrumental in project planning and execution, and often required for financing and regulatory approval to be granted. The International Seabed Authority currently requires an EIA for deep-sea mining (DSM) in areas beyond national jurisdiction (the Area), but the existing regulations present only a portion of a robust EIA process. This article presents an ideal EIA process for DSM, drawing upon the application of EIA from allied industries. It contains screening, scoping and assessment phases, along with the development of an environmental management plan. It also includes external review by experts, stakeholder consultation, and regulatory review. Lessons learned from application of EIA elsewhere are discussed in relation to DSM, including the integration of EIA into UK domestic law, and the reception of EIAs prepared for seabed ore extraction in the Exclusive Economic Zones of New Zealand and Papua New Guinea. Finally, four main challenges of implementing the EIA process to DSM in the Area are presented: 1) EIA process for DSM needs to incorporate mechanisms to address uncertainty; 2) detailed requirements for the EIA process phases should be made clear; 3) mechanisms are needed to ensure that the EIA influences decision making; and, 4) the EIA process requires substantial input and involvement from the regulator.",
author = "Durden, {Jennifer M.} and Lallier, {Laura E.} and Kevin Murphy and Aline Jaeckel and Kristina Gjerde and Jones, {Daniel O. B.}",
note = "Copyright the Author(s) 2017. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.013",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "194–202",
journal = "Marine Policy",
issn = "0308-597X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Durden, JM, Lallier, LE, Murphy, K, Jaeckel, A, Gjerde, K & Jones, DOB 2018, 'Environmental Impact Assessment process for deep-sea mining in 'the Area'', Marine Policy, vol. 87, pp. 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.013

Environmental Impact Assessment process for deep-sea mining in 'the Area'. / Durden, Jennifer M.; Lallier, Laura E.; Murphy, Kevin; Jaeckel, Aline; Gjerde, Kristina; Jones, Daniel O. B.

In: Marine Policy, Vol. 87, 01.2018, p. 194–202.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Environmental Impact Assessment process for deep-sea mining in 'the Area'

AU - Durden, Jennifer M.

AU - Lallier, Laura E.

AU - Murphy, Kevin

AU - Jaeckel, Aline

AU - Gjerde, Kristina

AU - Jones, Daniel O. B.

N1 - Copyright the Author(s) 2017. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

PY - 2018/1

Y1 - 2018/1

N2 - Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is key to the robust environmental management of industrial projects; it is used to anticipate, assess and reduce environmental and social risks of a project. It is instrumental in project planning and execution, and often required for financing and regulatory approval to be granted. The International Seabed Authority currently requires an EIA for deep-sea mining (DSM) in areas beyond national jurisdiction (the Area), but the existing regulations present only a portion of a robust EIA process. This article presents an ideal EIA process for DSM, drawing upon the application of EIA from allied industries. It contains screening, scoping and assessment phases, along with the development of an environmental management plan. It also includes external review by experts, stakeholder consultation, and regulatory review. Lessons learned from application of EIA elsewhere are discussed in relation to DSM, including the integration of EIA into UK domestic law, and the reception of EIAs prepared for seabed ore extraction in the Exclusive Economic Zones of New Zealand and Papua New Guinea. Finally, four main challenges of implementing the EIA process to DSM in the Area are presented: 1) EIA process for DSM needs to incorporate mechanisms to address uncertainty; 2) detailed requirements for the EIA process phases should be made clear; 3) mechanisms are needed to ensure that the EIA influences decision making; and, 4) the EIA process requires substantial input and involvement from the regulator.

AB - Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is key to the robust environmental management of industrial projects; it is used to anticipate, assess and reduce environmental and social risks of a project. It is instrumental in project planning and execution, and often required for financing and regulatory approval to be granted. The International Seabed Authority currently requires an EIA for deep-sea mining (DSM) in areas beyond national jurisdiction (the Area), but the existing regulations present only a portion of a robust EIA process. This article presents an ideal EIA process for DSM, drawing upon the application of EIA from allied industries. It contains screening, scoping and assessment phases, along with the development of an environmental management plan. It also includes external review by experts, stakeholder consultation, and regulatory review. Lessons learned from application of EIA elsewhere are discussed in relation to DSM, including the integration of EIA into UK domestic law, and the reception of EIAs prepared for seabed ore extraction in the Exclusive Economic Zones of New Zealand and Papua New Guinea. Finally, four main challenges of implementing the EIA process to DSM in the Area are presented: 1) EIA process for DSM needs to incorporate mechanisms to address uncertainty; 2) detailed requirements for the EIA process phases should be made clear; 3) mechanisms are needed to ensure that the EIA influences decision making; and, 4) the EIA process requires substantial input and involvement from the regulator.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033570846&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.013

DO - 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.013

M3 - Article

VL - 87

SP - 194

EP - 202

JO - Marine Policy

T2 - Marine Policy

JF - Marine Policy

SN - 0308-597X

ER -

Durden JM, Lallier LE, Murphy K, Jaeckel A, Gjerde K, Jones DOB. Environmental Impact Assessment process for deep-sea mining in 'the Area'. Marine Policy. 2018 Jan;87:194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.013