TY - JOUR
T1 - ‘Environments of concern’
T2 - reframing challenging behaviour within a human rights approach
AU - Jorgensen, Mikaela
AU - Nankervis, Karen
AU - Chan, Jeffrey
PY - 2023/1/2
Y1 - 2023/1/2
N2 - While disability is recognised by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) as an evolving concept, the language of positive behaviour support has not kept pace with the current human rights-based approach. The widely-used terms ‘challenging behaviour’ and ‘behaviours that challenge’ imply that the behaviour is inherent in a person with disability. Words have power in shaping practice: when the behaviour of the person with disability is framed as the problem, this leads to a pathologisation or labelling that can provide a rationale to medicate and restrain as a way of ‘managing the challenging behaviour’. Many behaviours seen as being challenging could be better understood as ‘adaptive behaviours to maladaptive environments’, or legitimate responses to difficult environments and situations. In this paper, we argue that the language and implementation of positive behaviour support should better take into account the CRPD and contemporary evidence on behaviour change interventions, which support a shift away from focusing on individuals’ behaviours towards putting environments front and centre. We outline how the social-ecological model could be used as a framework to more explicitly address ‘environments of concern’ in developing tailored and system-wide responses to behaviour support needs. We argue there is an urgency for this paradigm shift to better reflect the views of people with disability and improve outcomes.
AB - While disability is recognised by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) as an evolving concept, the language of positive behaviour support has not kept pace with the current human rights-based approach. The widely-used terms ‘challenging behaviour’ and ‘behaviours that challenge’ imply that the behaviour is inherent in a person with disability. Words have power in shaping practice: when the behaviour of the person with disability is framed as the problem, this leads to a pathologisation or labelling that can provide a rationale to medicate and restrain as a way of ‘managing the challenging behaviour’. Many behaviours seen as being challenging could be better understood as ‘adaptive behaviours to maladaptive environments’, or legitimate responses to difficult environments and situations. In this paper, we argue that the language and implementation of positive behaviour support should better take into account the CRPD and contemporary evidence on behaviour change interventions, which support a shift away from focusing on individuals’ behaviours towards putting environments front and centre. We outline how the social-ecological model could be used as a framework to more explicitly address ‘environments of concern’ in developing tailored and system-wide responses to behaviour support needs. We argue there is an urgency for this paradigm shift to better reflect the views of people with disability and improve outcomes.
KW - behaviours of concern
KW - challenging behaviour
KW - CRPD
KW - disability
KW - Human rights
KW - positive behaviour support
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147339953&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/20473869.2022.2118513
DO - 10.1080/20473869.2022.2118513
M3 - Article
C2 - 36743318
AN - SCOPUS:85147339953
SN - 2047-3869
VL - 69
SP - 95
EP - 100
JO - International Journal of Developmental Disabilities
JF - International Journal of Developmental Disabilities
IS - 1
ER -