Envisioning the future with ‘compassionate conservation’

an ominous projection for native wildlife and biodiversity

Alex Callen*, Matt W. Hayward, Kaya Klop-Toker, Benjamin L. Allen, Guy Ballard, Chad T. Beranek, Femke Broekhuis, Rohan H. Clarke, John Clulow, Simon Clulow, Jennifer C. Daltry, Harriet T. Davies-Mostert, Yamil E. Di Blanco, Victoria Dixon, Peter J. S. Fleming, Lachlan G. Howell, Graham I. H. Kerley, Sarah M. Legge, Dean J. Lenga, Tom Major & 15 others Robert A. Montgomery, Katherine Moseby, Ninon Meyer, Dan M. Parker, Stéphanie Périquet, John Read, Robert J. Scanlon, Craig Shuttleworth, Cottrell T. Tamessar, William Andrew Taylor, Katherine Tuft, Rose M. O. Upton, Marcia Valenzuela, Ryan R. Witt, Wolfgang Wüster

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalShort survey

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ‘Compassionate Conservation’ movement is gaining momentum through its promotion of ‘ethical’ conservation practices based on self-proclaimed principles of ‘first-do-no-harm’ and ‘individuals matter’. We argue that the tenets of ‘Compassionate Conservation’ are ideological - that is, they are not scientifically proven to improve conservation outcomes, yet are critical of the current methods that do. In this paper we envision a future with ‘Compassionate Conservation’ and predict how this might affect global biodiversity conservation. Taken literally, ‘Compassionate Conservation’ will deny current conservation practices such as captive breeding, introduced species control, biocontrol, conservation fencing, translocation, contraception, disease control and genetic introgression. Five mainstream conservation practices are used to illustrate the far-reaching and dire consequences for global biodiversity if governed by ‘Compassionate Conservation’. We acknowledge the important role of animal welfare science in conservation practices but argue that ‘Compassionate Conservation’ aligns more closely with animal liberation principles protecting individuals over populations. Ultimately we fear that a world of ‘Compassionate Conservation’ could stymie the global conservation efforts required to meet international biodiversity targets derived from evidenced based practice, such as the Aichi targets developed by the Convention on Biological Diversity and adopted by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and the United Nations.

Original languageEnglish
Article number108365
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalBiological Conservation
Volume241
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2020

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Captive breeding
  • Invasive species
  • Translocation
  • Contraception
  • Inbreeding

Cite this

Callen, A., Hayward, M. W., Klop-Toker, K., Allen, B. L., Ballard, G., Beranek, C. T., ... Wüster, W. (2020). Envisioning the future with ‘compassionate conservation’: an ominous projection for native wildlife and biodiversity. Biological Conservation, 241, 1-12. [108365]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108365