Equalising votes but enabling bias: The electoral impact of the 1977 and 1999 ward boundary reviews in London

Colin Rallings*, Ron Johnston, Michael Thrasher

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The boundaries of electoral units in Britain are periodically reviewed in order to enact the democratic principle of 'one person, one vote, one value'. The Commission-led reviews of local ward boundaries in London in the late 1970s and late 1990s both successfully reduced the variance in elector-councillor ratios within individual London boroughs and thereby helped to remove any bias in election outcomes stemming from malapportionment. However, other factors such as the efficiency with which a party's vote was distributed, the impact of differing levels of turnout and the intervention and success of third parties all remained crucial in determining the precise relationship between votes cast and seats won. It is impossible to ensure that all votes are equal under the 'first-past-the-post' system because these other components of electoral bias are either not subject to review, or amenable to manipulation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1367-1393
Number of pages27
JournalUrban Studies
Volume41
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2004

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Equalising votes but enabling bias: The electoral impact of the 1977 and 1999 ward boundary reviews in London'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this