TY - JOUR
T1 - Raltegravir non-inferior to nucleoside based regimens in second-line therapy with lopinavir/ritonavir over 96 weeks
T2 - a randomised open label study for the treatment of HIV-1 infection
AU - Amin, Janaki
AU - Boyd, Mark A.
AU - Kumarasamy, Nagalingeswaran
AU - Moore, Cecilia L.
AU - Losso, Marcello H.
AU - Nwizu, Chidi A.
AU - Mohapi, Lerato
AU - Kerr, Stephen J.
AU - Sohn, Annette H.
AU - Teppler, Hedy
AU - Renjifo, Boris
AU - Molina, Jean Michel
AU - Emery, Sean
AU - Cooper, David A.
AU - SECOND-LINE
N1 - This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
Erratum can be found at PLoS ONE volume 10(10), article e0140623, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140623
PY - 2015/2/27
Y1 - 2015/2/27
N2 - Objective: To determine the durability over 96 weeks of safety and efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) and raltegravir (RAL) which was demonstrated to have non-inferior efficacy relative to a regimen of LPV/r with nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (N(t)RTIs) (Control) in primary analysis at 48 weeks. Design: Open label, centrally randomised trial. Setting: Recruitment was from 37 primary and secondary care sites from Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe and Latin America. Subjects: 541 HIV-1 infected adults virologically failing first-line non-NRTI + 2N(t)RTI, with no previous exposure to protease inhibitors or integrase strand transfer inhibitors were analysed, 425 completed 96 weeks follow up on randomised therapy. Intervention: Randomisation was 1:1 to Control or RAL. Main outcome measures: Differences between the proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA (VL) <200 copies/mL by intention to treat were compared with a non-inferiority margin of -12%. Differences in biochemical, haematological and metabolic changes were assessed using T-tests. Results: VL <200 copies/mL at 96 weeks was: RAL 80.4%, Control 76.0%(difference: 4.4 [95%CI -2.6, 11.3]) andmet non-inferiority criteria. The RAL arm had a significantly higher mean change (difference Control-RAL; 95%CI) in haemoglobin (-2.9; -5.7, -1.1), total lymphocytes (-0.2; -0.3, -0.0), total cholesterol (-0.5; -0.8, -0.3), HDL cholesterol (-0.1; -0.1, -0.0) and LDL cholesterol (-0.3; -0.5, -0.2). Conclusion: At 96 weeks, both RAL and Control maintained efficacy greater than 75% and continued to demonstrate similar safety profiles. These results support the use of a combination LPV/r and RAL regimen as an option following failure of 1st line NNRTI + 2N(t)RTIs. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00931463.
AB - Objective: To determine the durability over 96 weeks of safety and efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) and raltegravir (RAL) which was demonstrated to have non-inferior efficacy relative to a regimen of LPV/r with nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (N(t)RTIs) (Control) in primary analysis at 48 weeks. Design: Open label, centrally randomised trial. Setting: Recruitment was from 37 primary and secondary care sites from Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe and Latin America. Subjects: 541 HIV-1 infected adults virologically failing first-line non-NRTI + 2N(t)RTI, with no previous exposure to protease inhibitors or integrase strand transfer inhibitors were analysed, 425 completed 96 weeks follow up on randomised therapy. Intervention: Randomisation was 1:1 to Control or RAL. Main outcome measures: Differences between the proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA (VL) <200 copies/mL by intention to treat were compared with a non-inferiority margin of -12%. Differences in biochemical, haematological and metabolic changes were assessed using T-tests. Results: VL <200 copies/mL at 96 weeks was: RAL 80.4%, Control 76.0%(difference: 4.4 [95%CI -2.6, 11.3]) andmet non-inferiority criteria. The RAL arm had a significantly higher mean change (difference Control-RAL; 95%CI) in haemoglobin (-2.9; -5.7, -1.1), total lymphocytes (-0.2; -0.3, -0.0), total cholesterol (-0.5; -0.8, -0.3), HDL cholesterol (-0.1; -0.1, -0.0) and LDL cholesterol (-0.3; -0.5, -0.2). Conclusion: At 96 weeks, both RAL and Control maintained efficacy greater than 75% and continued to demonstrate similar safety profiles. These results support the use of a combination LPV/r and RAL regimen as an option following failure of 1st line NNRTI + 2N(t)RTIs. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00931463.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923783265&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948698569&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140623
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0118228
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0118228
M3 - Article
C2 - 25723472
AN - SCOPUS:84923783265
VL - 10
SP - 1
EP - 13
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
SN - 1932-6203
IS - 2
M1 - e0118228
ER -