Understanding sources of variation in syndromic surveillance for early warning of natural or intentional disease outbreaks

Ross Sparks*, Chris Carter, Petra Graham, David Muscatello, Tim Churches, Jill Kaldor, Robin Turner, Wei Zheng, Louise Ryan

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    45 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Daily counts of computer records of hospital emergency department arrivals grouped according to diagnosis (called here syndrome groupings) can be monitored by epidemiologists for changes in frequency that could provide early warning of bioterrorism events or naturally occurring disease outbreaks and epidemics. This type of public health surveillance is sometimes called syndromic surveillance. We used transitional Poisson regression models to obtain one-day-ahead arrival forecasts. Regression parameter estimates and forecasts were updated for each day using the latest 365 days of data. The resulting time series of recursive estimates of parameters such as the amplitude and location of the seasonal peaks as well as the one-day-ahead forecasts and forecast errors can be monitored to understand changes in epidemiology of each syndrome grouping. The counts for each syndrome grouping were autocorrelated and non-homogeneous Poisson. As such, the main methodological contribution of the article is the adaptation of Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) and Exponentially Weighted Moving Average (EWMA) plans for monitoring non-homogeneous counts. These plans were valid for small counts where the assumption of normally distributed one-day-ahead forecasts errors, typically used in other papers, breaks down. In addition, these adaptive plans have the advantage that control limits do not have to be trained for different syndrome groupings or aggregations of emergency departments. Conventional methods for signaling increases in syndrome grouping counts, Shewhart, CUSUM, and EWMA control charts of the standardized forecast errors were also examined. Shewhart charts were, at times, insensitive to shifts of interest. CUSUM and EWMA charts were only reasonable for large counts. We illustrate our methods with respiratory, influenza, diarrhea, and abdominal pain syndrome groupings.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)613-631
    Number of pages19
    JournalIIE Transactions (Institute of Industrial Engineers)
    Volume42
    Issue number9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2010

    Bibliographical note

    Erratum can be found in IIE Transactions (Institute of Industrial Engineers), Volume 43(3), 231, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0740817X.2011.547782

    Keywords

    • control charts
    • CUSUM
    • EWMA
    • monitoring
    • Poisson regression
    • Shewhart charts
    • epidemiology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding sources of variation in syndromic surveillance for early warning of natural or intentional disease outbreaks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this