Errors of inflection in the writing of normal and poor readers.

Karen M. Smith-Lock*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigated the speech and writing of 18 normal and 11 poor readers in second grade in order to determine whether children make morphological errors in writing that they do not make in speech. Ten sentences with complex syntactic structures were elicited, both orally and in writing (e.g., "Who do you think eats fries?" "Point to the dog that licks babies"). Each sentence provided opportunities for the children to erroneously omit, add, or substitute an inflection. In the spoken task, virtually no inflectional errors were observed in either group. In contrast, in the written task, good readers omitted an average of 0.4 inflections out of a possible 20 whereas the poor readers omitted an average of 7.6 inflections each, a highly significant difference. This suggests that poor readers have adequate grammatical knowledge, but poor explicit awareness of morphological structure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)341-350
Number of pages10
JournalLanguage and speech
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1991

Keywords

  • inflections
  • morphological awareness
  • reading ability
  • writing

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Errors of inflection in the writing of normal and poor readers.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this