TY - JOUR
T1 - Establishing additionality
T2 - Fraud vulnerabilities in the clean development mechanism
AU - Drew, Jacqueline M.
AU - Drew, Michael E.
PY - 2010/11/23
Y1 - 2010/11/23
N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the clean development mechanism (CDM) which creates carbon credits from emission abatement projects in developing economies. The paper aims to examine the operation of the CDM with specific reference to fraud vulnerabilities regarding the additionality of a project. An examination of the process of establishment, certification and verification of additionality (confirmation that emissions postimplementation of the CDM project are lower than those that would have occurred under the most plausible alternative scenario) is used to highlight the need for particular vigilance in respect to sustaining and improving the integrity of future marketbased mechanisms postKyoto. Design/methodology/approach – The study takes a case study approach, examining the CDM project cycle and associated key entities. Findings – The study posits that the processes associated with establishing and verifying additionality of a project are potentially key areas of systemic weakness that must be addressed. This case study explores the design features of the CDM that may afford greater opportunities for fraudulent or deceptive practices. Originality/value – The CDM takes a projectbyproject approach to establishment, verification and certification of additionality. Whilst conceptually this design may be appropriate from an operational perspective, it potentially provides opportunities for fraudulent outcomes. The individualised approach is, by its very nature, highly resourceintensive and inherently difficult to verify.
AB - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the clean development mechanism (CDM) which creates carbon credits from emission abatement projects in developing economies. The paper aims to examine the operation of the CDM with specific reference to fraud vulnerabilities regarding the additionality of a project. An examination of the process of establishment, certification and verification of additionality (confirmation that emissions postimplementation of the CDM project are lower than those that would have occurred under the most plausible alternative scenario) is used to highlight the need for particular vigilance in respect to sustaining and improving the integrity of future marketbased mechanisms postKyoto. Design/methodology/approach – The study takes a case study approach, examining the CDM project cycle and associated key entities. Findings – The study posits that the processes associated with establishing and verifying additionality of a project are potentially key areas of systemic weakness that must be addressed. This case study explores the design features of the CDM that may afford greater opportunities for fraudulent or deceptive practices. Originality/value – The CDM takes a projectbyproject approach to establishment, verification and certification of additionality. Whilst conceptually this design may be appropriate from an operational perspective, it potentially provides opportunities for fraudulent outcomes. The individualised approach is, by its very nature, highly resourceintensive and inherently difficult to verify.
KW - Fraud
KW - Pollution
KW - Project management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953171181&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/10309611011092574
DO - 10.1108/10309611011092574
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:79953171181
SN - 1030-9616
VL - 23
SP - 243
EP - 253
JO - Accounting Research Journal
JF - Accounting Research Journal
IS - 3
ER -