Estimating landholders' probability of participating in a stewardship program, and the implications for spatial conservation priorities

Vanessa M. Adams*, Robert L. Pressey, Natalie Stoeckl

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)
18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The need to integrate social and economic factors into conservation planning has become a focus of academic discussions and has important practical implications for the implementation of conservation areas, both private and public. We conducted a survey in the Daly Catchment, Northern Territory, to inform the design and implementation of a stewardship payment program. We used a choice model to estimate the likely level of participation in two legal arrangements - conservation covenants and management agreements - based on payment level and proportion of properties required to be managed. We then spatially predicted landholders' probability of participating at the resolution of individual properties and incorporated these predictions into conservation planning software to examine the potential for the stewardship program to meet conservation objectives. We found that the properties that were least costly, per unit area, to manage were also the least likely to participate. This highlights a tension between planning for a cost-effective program and planning for a program that targets properties with the highest probability of participation. 

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere97941
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume9
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jun 2014
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2014. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Estimating landholders' probability of participating in a stewardship program, and the implications for spatial conservation priorities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this