Ethical discriminations? Representing the reprehensible

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper reflects upon the 'goodness' or 'ethics' of Critical Management/Critical Organisation Studies (COS) research practices. I argue that academic representations of others entail an ethical responsibility to the researched, a responsibility that COS is, as yet, insufficiently exploring. Reflecting upon my own research with those who have colluded in discrimination and Stanley and Wise's (1979) research on obscene telephone callers, I explore the nature and limits of responsibility when researching those who have acted reprehensibly. I end by arguing that COS "owe(s) some responsibility to 'the researched' of all kinds, whether we morally approve of them or not" (Stanley and Wise 1993:177).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalTamara journal for critical organization inquiry
Volume2
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Ethical discriminations? Representing the reprehensible'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this