Ethical irony and the relational leader: grappling with the infinity of ethics and the finitude of practice

Carl Rhodes, Richard Badham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Relational leadership invokes an ethics involving a leader's affective engagement and genuine concern with the interests of others. This ethics faces practical difficulties given it implies a seemingly limitless responsibility to a set of incommensurable ethical demands. This article contributes to addressing the impasse this creates in three ways. First, it clarifies the nature of the tensions involved by theorising relational leadership as caught in an irreconcilable bind between an infinitely demanding ethics and the finite possibilities of a response to those demands. Second, it examines this ethical challenge in acknowledgement of the hierarchical discourses and power dynamics in which leadership relationships are constrained and enacted. Third, it proposes ethical irony as a way leaders can respond to the demand for ethics without resulting in either an escape from ethics, or being crushed by its burden. Three dimensions of ethical irony are examined: ironic perspective, ironic performance, and ironic predilection.

LanguageEnglish
Pages71-98
Number of pages28
JournalBusiness Ethics Quarterly
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Irony
Infinity
Finitude
Relational leadership
Burden
Impasse
Responsibility
Affective
Discourse
Acknowledgement
Theorizing

Cite this

@article{a027f25e6106491d868c755184abe652,
title = "Ethical irony and the relational leader: grappling with the infinity of ethics and the finitude of practice",
abstract = "Relational leadership invokes an ethics involving a leader's affective engagement and genuine concern with the interests of others. This ethics faces practical difficulties given it implies a seemingly limitless responsibility to a set of incommensurable ethical demands. This article contributes to addressing the impasse this creates in three ways. First, it clarifies the nature of the tensions involved by theorising relational leadership as caught in an irreconcilable bind between an infinitely demanding ethics and the finite possibilities of a response to those demands. Second, it examines this ethical challenge in acknowledgement of the hierarchical discourses and power dynamics in which leadership relationships are constrained and enacted. Third, it proposes ethical irony as a way leaders can respond to the demand for ethics without resulting in either an escape from ethics, or being crushed by its burden. Three dimensions of ethical irony are examined: ironic perspective, ironic performance, and ironic predilection.",
keywords = "irony, Emmanuel Levinas, leadership ethics, relational ethics, relational leadership",
author = "Carl Rhodes and Richard Badham",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1017/beq.2017.7",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "71--98",
journal = "Business Ethics Quarterly",
issn = "1052-150X",
publisher = "Philosophy Documentation Center",
number = "1",

}

Ethical irony and the relational leader : grappling with the infinity of ethics and the finitude of practice. / Rhodes, Carl; Badham, Richard.

In: Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 1, 01.2018, p. 71-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethical irony and the relational leader

T2 - Business Ethics Quarterly

AU - Rhodes,Carl

AU - Badham,Richard

PY - 2018/1

Y1 - 2018/1

N2 - Relational leadership invokes an ethics involving a leader's affective engagement and genuine concern with the interests of others. This ethics faces practical difficulties given it implies a seemingly limitless responsibility to a set of incommensurable ethical demands. This article contributes to addressing the impasse this creates in three ways. First, it clarifies the nature of the tensions involved by theorising relational leadership as caught in an irreconcilable bind between an infinitely demanding ethics and the finite possibilities of a response to those demands. Second, it examines this ethical challenge in acknowledgement of the hierarchical discourses and power dynamics in which leadership relationships are constrained and enacted. Third, it proposes ethical irony as a way leaders can respond to the demand for ethics without resulting in either an escape from ethics, or being crushed by its burden. Three dimensions of ethical irony are examined: ironic perspective, ironic performance, and ironic predilection.

AB - Relational leadership invokes an ethics involving a leader's affective engagement and genuine concern with the interests of others. This ethics faces practical difficulties given it implies a seemingly limitless responsibility to a set of incommensurable ethical demands. This article contributes to addressing the impasse this creates in three ways. First, it clarifies the nature of the tensions involved by theorising relational leadership as caught in an irreconcilable bind between an infinitely demanding ethics and the finite possibilities of a response to those demands. Second, it examines this ethical challenge in acknowledgement of the hierarchical discourses and power dynamics in which leadership relationships are constrained and enacted. Third, it proposes ethical irony as a way leaders can respond to the demand for ethics without resulting in either an escape from ethics, or being crushed by its burden. Three dimensions of ethical irony are examined: ironic perspective, ironic performance, and ironic predilection.

KW - irony

KW - Emmanuel Levinas

KW - leadership ethics

KW - relational ethics

KW - relational leadership

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039991342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/beq.2017.7

DO - 10.1017/beq.2017.7

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 71

EP - 98

JO - Business Ethics Quarterly

JF - Business Ethics Quarterly

SN - 1052-150X

IS - 1

ER -