Ethical risks in work-integrated learning: a study of Canadian practitioners

Craig Cameron*, Christine Dodds, Cynthia Maclean

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

WIL practitioners encounter ethical issues, dilemmas, or conflicts (‘risks’) in the delivery of work-integrated learning (WIL) programs. Ethical risks which are not properly managed can have reputational, legal, and financial consequences for the higher education institution (HEI). Whilst students’ experiences of ethical risks, particularly in health-related WIL programs, have been extensively reported in the literature, there is no known systematic study that has explored ethical risks in WIL from the sole perspective of WIL practitioners. A case study of 10 Canadian practitioners identifies five key characteristics of ethics underpinning the delivery of co-operative education programs, as well as ethical risks that they have experienced relating to the conduct of WIL practitioners, students, and employers. The findings can be applied by WIL stakeholders to enhance their ethical awareness, and to improve management of ethical risks.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)83-95
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Work-Integrated Learning
Volume20
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Co-operative education
  • Ethical risk
  • Ethics
  • Risk management
  • Work-integrated learning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ethical risks in work-integrated learning: a study of Canadian practitioners'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this