Ethics creep or governance creep? Challenges for Australian Human Research Ethics Committees (HRECs)

Susanna M. Gorman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Australian Human Research Ethics Committees (HRECs) have to contend with ever-increasing workloads and responsibilities which go well beyond questions of mere ethics. In this article, I shall examine how the roles of HRECs have changed, and show how this is reflected in the iterations of the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research 2007 (NS). In particular I suggest that the focus of the National Statement has shifted to concentrate on matters of research governance at the expense of research ethics, compounded by its linkage to the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research (2007) in its most recent iteration. I shall explore some of the challenges this poses for HRECs and institutions and the risks it poses to ensuring that Australian researchers receive clear ethical guidance and review.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-16
    Number of pages16
    JournalMonash Bioethics Review
    Volume29
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Ethics creep or governance creep? Challenges for Australian Human Research Ethics Committees (HRECs)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this