@inproceedings{3b0794df65ad4d4baf52201531d42368,
title = "Evaluating accuracy in prudence analysis for cyber security",
abstract = "Conventional Knowledge-Based Systems (KBS) have no way of detecting or signalling when their knowledge is insufficient to handle a case. Consequently, these systems may produce an uninformed conclusion when presented with a case beyond their current knowledge (brittleness) which results in the KBS giving incorrect conclusions due to insufficient knowledge or ignorance on a specific case. Prudence Analysis (PA) has been shown to be a viable alternative to brittleness in Ripple Down Rules (RDR) knowledge bases. To date, there have been two approaches to Prudence; attribute-based and structural-based prudence. This paper introduces Integrated Prudence Analysis (IPA), a novel Prudence method formed by combining these methods.",
keywords = "Expert systems, IPA, Prudence analysis",
author = "Omaru Maruatona and Peter Vamplew and Richard Dazeley and Watters, \{Paul A.\}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-70139-4\_41",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319701387",
series = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)",
publisher = "Springer, Springer Nature",
pages = "407--417",
editor = "Derong Liu and Shengli Xie and Yuanqing Li and Dongbin Zhao and El-Alfy, \{El-Sayed M.\}",
booktitle = "Neural Information Processing",
address = "United States",
note = "24th International Conference on Neural Information Processing, ICONIP 2017 ; Conference date: 14-11-2017 Through 18-11-2017",
}