Abstract
When an Australian citizen is wrongfully or arbitrarily detained abroad the response they should expect from their government at a consular, political and diplomatic level is often unclear. Efforts at case management and ultimately, resolution, are further complicated by an absence of specific criteria for identifying wrongful or arbitrary detentions, and an operational environment in which resource allocation and the extent of diplomatic intervention appear to be determined on an ad hoc basis. The distinctiveness of each case and a general paucity of publicly available data render attempts to evaluate the effectiveness of Australia’s management of wrongful and arbitrary detention cases challenging. Drawing on evidence and testimony presented to a 2024 Senate Inquiry into the wrongful detention of Australians overseas, this article adapts an evaluation framework developed by Tindall and Hart to measure governments’ responsiveness to large-scale overseas consular emergencies to the management of wrongful and arbitrary detention cases.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 273-289 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Australian Journal of Political Science |
| Volume | 60 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 12 Aug 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright the Author(s) 2025. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.Keywords
- wrongful detention
- arbitrary detention
- consular management
- consular policy
- hostage diplomacy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating Australia's consular management of cases of wrongful and arbitrary detention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver