Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evaluating the clinical-and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implant sound processor upgrades in older adults: outcomes from a large Australian multicenter study

Paola Incerti, Jermy Pang, Jason Gavrilis, Vicky Zhang, Jessica Tsiolkas, Rajan Sharma, Elizabeth Seil, Antonio Ahumada-Canale, Bonny Parkinson, Padraig Kitterick

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Many older Australian adults with cochlear implants (CI) lack funding for replacement sound processors, risking complete device failure and reduced quality of life. The need for replacement CI devices for individuals with obsolete sound processors and no access to funding poses an increasing public health challenge in Australia and worldwide. We aimed to investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of upgrading obsolete CI sound processors in older adults.

Methods: Alongside an Australian Government-funded upgrade program, a prospective, mixed-methodology design study was undertaken. Participants were aged 65 and over, with obsolete Cochlear™ sound processors and no funding for replacements. This study compared speech perception in noise, as well as self-reported outcome measures, including cognition, listening effort, fatigue, device benefit, mental well-being, participation, empowerment and user experiences, between upgraded and obsolete hearing aid processors. The economic impact of the upgrade was evaluated using two state-transition microsimulation models of adults using CIs.

Results: The multi-site study ran from 20 May 2021 to 21 April 2023, with recruitment from June 2021 to May 2022. A total of 340 Cochlear™ sound processors were upgraded in 304 adults. The adults’ mean age was 77.4 years (SD 6.6), and 48.5% were female. Hearing loss onset occurred on average at 30 years (SD 21.0), with 12 years (SD 6.2) of CI use. The outcomes show significant improvements in speech understanding in noise and reduced communication difficulties, self-reported listening effort and fatigue. Semi-structured interviews have revealed that upgrades alleviated the anxiety and fear of sudden processor failure. Health economic analysis found that the cost-effectiveness of upgrades stemmed from preventing device failures, rather than from access to newer technology features.

Conclusions: Our study identified significant clinical and self-reported benefits from upgrading Cochlear™ sound processors. Economic value came from avoiding scenarios where a total failure of device renders its user unable to access sound. The evidence gathered can be used to inform policy on CI processor upgrades for older adults.

Original languageEnglish
Article number3765
Pages (from-to)1-25
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Clinical Medicine
Volume14
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2025

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2025. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • clinical effectiveness
  • cochlear implants
  • cost-effectiveness
  • obsolescence
  • older adults
  • sound processor upgrade

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating the clinical-and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implant sound processor upgrades in older adults: outcomes from a large Australian multicenter study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this