Even womb surrogates think

rethinking labour and maternal work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Feminists are generally agreed that mothering is a form of work, is certainly
felt as such and clearly makes economic and social contributions to society, but feminist theory remains unsettled on whether mothering can be theorised through a Marxian understanding of production, reproduction and labour. Stella Sandford revisited the dilemma in this journal, concluding as have others, that the notion of ‘maternal labour’ was fundamentally dichotomous and that a focus on what is specific to mothering depleted it of its potential character as labour. I argue that the difficulties that have persisted in theorizing mothering as work have arisen from a too-narrow understanding of work and consequently of ‘labour’. This paper builds on insights into working, work, maternal work, and capitalism developed by Christophe Dejours, Sarah Ruddick and Nancy Fraser. It argues that with an enriched understanding of work and working being an activity that engages the whole of the subject and which is formative of identity, it is then possible to understand mothering as labour that is both affective, intersubjective and ‘reproductive’.
Original languageEnglish
Article number7
Pages (from-to)1-23
Number of pages23
JournalStudies in the maternal
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Nov 2019

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2019. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • mothering
  • maternal work
  • work
  • labour
  • Christophe Dejours
  • Nancy Fraser
  • Sara Ruddick
  • capitalism
  • neo-liberalism
  • feminist theory

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Even womb surrogates think: rethinking labour and maternal work'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this