Everyday conversation after right hemisphere damage: a methodological demonstration and some preliminary findings

Scott Barnes, Sophie Toocaram, Lyndsey Nickels, Suzanne Beeke, Wendy Best, Steven Bloch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Right hemisphere damage impairs lexical processing, prosodic processing, and discourse and pragmatics. Clinicians and researchers have observed that conversation is a challenging communicative activity for people with right hemisphere communication disorder, but previous studies have yielded inconsistent, equivocal, and marginal results, with few clear demonstrations of conversational dysfunction. There are also no empirical studies of everyday conversations involving people with right hemisphere damage and their familiar communication partners (e.g., family, friends). This study explores how a man with conversational problems following right hemisphere stroke formulated responses to communicative acts addressed to him in everyday conversation. It focuses on communicative acts that were “response mobilising”, i.e., set out clear expectations about who should speak, and how they should respond. This study employed an empirical descriptive case study design to examine 43 min of triadic conversation between the man with right hemisphere damage, his spouse, and a family friend. 61 communicative acts addressed to the man with right hemisphere damage were analysed using conversation analytic techniques. Few instances were found in which the man with right hemisphere damage was insensitive to the communicative contingencies implemented through these communicative acts. However, the instances where he was insensitive to them were salient. The findings of this study indicate that response mobilising communicative acts hold some potential for describing behavioural presentation of right hemisphere communication disorder in conversation.

LanguageEnglish
Article number100850
Pages1-19
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Neurolinguistics
Volume52
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2019

Fingerprint

damages
conversation
Communication Disorders
communication disorder
Interpersonal Relations
Spouses
Stroke
Research Personnel
stroke
contingency
spouse
Communicative Act
Right Hemisphere Damage
pragmatics
discourse
communication
Right Hemisphere

Keywords

  • right hemisphere damage
  • communication disorder
  • conversation
  • conversation analysis

Cite this

@article{7a1060d75b9f4e4d9807f45cc4aa1f68,
title = "Everyday conversation after right hemisphere damage: a methodological demonstration and some preliminary findings",
abstract = "Right hemisphere damage impairs lexical processing, prosodic processing, and discourse and pragmatics. Clinicians and researchers have observed that conversation is a challenging communicative activity for people with right hemisphere communication disorder, but previous studies have yielded inconsistent, equivocal, and marginal results, with few clear demonstrations of conversational dysfunction. There are also no empirical studies of everyday conversations involving people with right hemisphere damage and their familiar communication partners (e.g., family, friends). This study explores how a man with conversational problems following right hemisphere stroke formulated responses to communicative acts addressed to him in everyday conversation. It focuses on communicative acts that were “response mobilising”, i.e., set out clear expectations about who should speak, and how they should respond. This study employed an empirical descriptive case study design to examine 43 min of triadic conversation between the man with right hemisphere damage, his spouse, and a family friend. 61 communicative acts addressed to the man with right hemisphere damage were analysed using conversation analytic techniques. Few instances were found in which the man with right hemisphere damage was insensitive to the communicative contingencies implemented through these communicative acts. However, the instances where he was insensitive to them were salient. The findings of this study indicate that response mobilising communicative acts hold some potential for describing behavioural presentation of right hemisphere communication disorder in conversation.",
keywords = "right hemisphere damage, communication disorder, conversation, conversation analysis",
author = "Scott Barnes and Sophie Toocaram and Lyndsey Nickels and Suzanne Beeke and Wendy Best and Steven Bloch",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jneuroling.2019.100850",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "1--19",
journal = "Journal of Neurolinguistics",
issn = "0911-6044",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

Everyday conversation after right hemisphere damage : a methodological demonstration and some preliminary findings. / Barnes, Scott; Toocaram, Sophie; Nickels, Lyndsey; Beeke, Suzanne; Best, Wendy; Bloch, Steven.

In: Journal of Neurolinguistics, Vol. 52, 100850, 01.11.2019, p. 1-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Everyday conversation after right hemisphere damage

T2 - Journal of Neurolinguistics

AU - Barnes, Scott

AU - Toocaram, Sophie

AU - Nickels, Lyndsey

AU - Beeke, Suzanne

AU - Best, Wendy

AU - Bloch, Steven

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - Right hemisphere damage impairs lexical processing, prosodic processing, and discourse and pragmatics. Clinicians and researchers have observed that conversation is a challenging communicative activity for people with right hemisphere communication disorder, but previous studies have yielded inconsistent, equivocal, and marginal results, with few clear demonstrations of conversational dysfunction. There are also no empirical studies of everyday conversations involving people with right hemisphere damage and their familiar communication partners (e.g., family, friends). This study explores how a man with conversational problems following right hemisphere stroke formulated responses to communicative acts addressed to him in everyday conversation. It focuses on communicative acts that were “response mobilising”, i.e., set out clear expectations about who should speak, and how they should respond. This study employed an empirical descriptive case study design to examine 43 min of triadic conversation between the man with right hemisphere damage, his spouse, and a family friend. 61 communicative acts addressed to the man with right hemisphere damage were analysed using conversation analytic techniques. Few instances were found in which the man with right hemisphere damage was insensitive to the communicative contingencies implemented through these communicative acts. However, the instances where he was insensitive to them were salient. The findings of this study indicate that response mobilising communicative acts hold some potential for describing behavioural presentation of right hemisphere communication disorder in conversation.

AB - Right hemisphere damage impairs lexical processing, prosodic processing, and discourse and pragmatics. Clinicians and researchers have observed that conversation is a challenging communicative activity for people with right hemisphere communication disorder, but previous studies have yielded inconsistent, equivocal, and marginal results, with few clear demonstrations of conversational dysfunction. There are also no empirical studies of everyday conversations involving people with right hemisphere damage and their familiar communication partners (e.g., family, friends). This study explores how a man with conversational problems following right hemisphere stroke formulated responses to communicative acts addressed to him in everyday conversation. It focuses on communicative acts that were “response mobilising”, i.e., set out clear expectations about who should speak, and how they should respond. This study employed an empirical descriptive case study design to examine 43 min of triadic conversation between the man with right hemisphere damage, his spouse, and a family friend. 61 communicative acts addressed to the man with right hemisphere damage were analysed using conversation analytic techniques. Few instances were found in which the man with right hemisphere damage was insensitive to the communicative contingencies implemented through these communicative acts. However, the instances where he was insensitive to them were salient. The findings of this study indicate that response mobilising communicative acts hold some potential for describing behavioural presentation of right hemisphere communication disorder in conversation.

KW - right hemisphere damage

KW - communication disorder

KW - conversation

KW - conversation analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067850472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2019.100850

DO - 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2019.100850

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 1

EP - 19

JO - Journal of Neurolinguistics

JF - Journal of Neurolinguistics

SN - 0911-6044

M1 - 100850

ER -