Abstract
Successful outcomes of endoscopic approaches to benign sinonasal tumors have launched interest in expanding its use for sinonasal malignancy. Because of the heterogeneity and rarity of sinonasal malignancy, evidence for clinical outcomes of endoscopic approaches versus traditional craniofacial resection is low. Using the Oxford Center for Evidence-based Medicine guidelines, we present the existing evidence comparing both techniques for a variety of sinonasal malignancies.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1127-1142 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America |
Volume | 45 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2012 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Endoscopic resection
- Evidence-based otolaryngology
- Head and neck cancer
- Malignant cancer
- Skull base