Abstract
Policy question: Does double-checking by nurses reduce medication administration errors and improve efficiency?
Current evidence shows: There is some evidence that when independent double-checking occurs, errors are reduced. The effectiveness of double-checking lies in it being an independent cognitive task, not a superficial routine task. Many health care organisations have a policy of double-checking. However these often do not contain explicit definitions, and are inconsistently applied in practice, which dilute any potential safety benefits. Double-checking is resource-intensive
and a significant burden for nursing staff. Qualitative research suggests nurses
perceive some advantages in single-checking related to increased autonomy, better use of resources and reduced interruptions to work.
Current evidence shows: There is some evidence that when independent double-checking occurs, errors are reduced. The effectiveness of double-checking lies in it being an independent cognitive task, not a superficial routine task. Many health care organisations have a policy of double-checking. However these often do not contain explicit definitions, and are inconsistently applied in practice, which dilute any potential safety benefits. Double-checking is resource-intensive
and a significant burden for nursing staff. Qualitative research suggests nurses
perceive some advantages in single-checking related to increased autonomy, better use of resources and reduced interruptions to work.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publisher | University of New South Wales |
Number of pages | 4 |
Volume | 1(3) |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2013 |
Externally published | Yes |