Abstract
For Kant, we cannot understand how to approach moral education without confronting the radical evil of humanity. But if we start out, as Kant thinks we do, from a morally corrupt state, how can we make moral progress? In response, I explore in this paper Kant’s gradualist and revolutionary accounts of moral progress. These differing accounts of progress raise two key questions in the literature: are these accounts compatible and which type of progress comes first? Against other views in the literature, I argue that gradual progress through a change of mores must come first and can gradually lead toward, as its ideal endpoint, a revolution in our disposition (or a change of heart) and the overthrowing of our radical evil. This has important implications for moral pedagogy.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1317-1326 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Educational Philosophy and Theory |
Volume | 51 |
Issue number | 13 |
Early online date | 19 Jun 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2019 |
Keywords
- Education
- Evil
- Kant
- Moral Pedagogy
- Radical Evil
- Virtue